Re: [PATCH] One more -x to not traverse cyclic bind-mounts

2011-01-19 Thread Jeff Hansen
On 01/19/2011 12:52 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:40 -0700, Jeff Hansen wrote: The way rsync determines if the directory is a mount point looks very portable to me (with the FLAG_TOP_DIR bit), and with this patch, it has worked on every Linux system I've tried so far (not su

Re: [PATCH] One more -x to not traverse cyclic bind-mounts

2011-01-19 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:40 -0700, Jeff Hansen wrote: > The way rsync determines if the directory is a mount point looks very > portable to me (with the FLAG_TOP_DIR bit), and with this patch, it > has worked on every Linux system I've tried so far (not sure if > FLAG_TOP_DIR works on BSDs, but I'm

Re: [PATCH] One more -x to not traverse cyclic bind-mounts

2011-01-19 Thread Jeff Hansen
On 01/18/2011 05:45 PM, Wayne Davison wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Hansen mailto:jhan...@cardaccess-inc.com>> wrote: I hate to beat an (apparently) dead horse, but I've tested this patch on several systems and I would really appreciate it if this patch (or some vari

Re: Implicit --itemize

2011-01-19 Thread Steven Levine
In <5.2.0.9.1.20110119091636.04a65ae0@localhost>, on 01/19/11 at 09:17 AM, Fabian Cenedese said: Hi, >I use the same construct in other scripts without having this problem. So >I think the escaping is already correct. The main reason might be the >logfile command as Matt pointed out. I will t

Re: Implicit --itemize

2011-01-19 Thread Fabian Cenedese
At 07:44 18.01.2011 -0800, you wrote: >In <5.2.0.9.1.20110118091956.04afb940@localhost>, on 01/18/11 > at 09:32 AM, Fabian Cenedese said: > >Hi, > >>Is it possible that "SSH -i key" could also be scanned by rsync and >>interpreted as --itemize? > >That is what is happening. You have > > -e "$SS