[Bug 8100] New: binding to multiple addresses

2011-04-20 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8100 Summary: binding to multiple addresses Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: c

files not moved immediately to final destination from temp location after rsync returns with success

2011-04-20 Thread Alistair Dsouza
Hi, I am using rsync version 3.0.7 on an arm linux based embedded device. The device pulls data periodically from a rsync server and stores the files on an SD card. The partial, temp and final rsync destinations all reside on the SD card. I came across an issue where it seems that the rsync call

Re: files not moved immediately to final destination from temp location after rsync returns with success

2011-04-20 Thread Alistair Dsouza
Also wanted to clarify that both the rsync calls in the script are run to completion (not in the background) and there is a delay of 180 seconds between the two calls. when the issue is seen the logs in the email below show the rsync messages from the two rsync calls are interleaved. regards, Ali

Re: files not moved immediately to final destination from temp location after rsync returns with success

2011-04-20 Thread Henri Shustak
> I am using rsync version 3.0.7 on an arm linux based embedded device. The > device pulls data periodically from a rsync server and stores the files on an > SD card. The partial, temp and final rsync destinations all reside on the SD > card. > > I came across an issue where it seems that the

RE: files not moved immediately to final destination from temp location after rsync returns with success

2011-04-20 Thread Tony Abernethy
OK, I'll bite. With all file system designs, there is a tradeoff between speed and safety. This tradeoff occurs at all levels where there might be something that buffers information. Writing into the middle of a structure can be incredibly slow if everything is done safely. Enter disk caches (Op

[Bug 6116] Cannot access files in exposed shadow drive in version 3.0.5

2011-04-20 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6116 --- Comment #7 from Leon V. 2011-04-20 23:34:44 UTC --- I decided to "hack" at this some more. I downloaded the source code for 3.0.8 and compiled it, and began to run GDB. Not sure if this will help, but the call to util.c change_dir() with cygdr

[Bug 6116] Cannot access files in exposed shadow drive in version 3.0.5

2011-04-20 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6116 --- Comment #8 from Matt McCutchen 2011-04-21 00:56:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > The global variable curr_dir starts out correctly containing > "/cygdrive/c/Downloads/rsync308" but when the call to > change_dir(cygdir/g) is made, it has b

[Bug 6116] Cannot access files in exposed shadow drive in version 3.0.5

2011-04-20 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6116 --- Comment #9 from Leon V. 2011-04-21 03:14:33 UTC --- the Windows UNC convention is backslash backslash (\\servername\...) not forward slashes. As to where the // is coming from, I have never been able to get a gdb variable watch to work on my sy