Re: Just delete extraneous files, without updating other changes?

2012-02-16 Thread Bryan Pliatsios
Kevin, thanks so much, I should have read the man page closer: --existing, --ignore-non-existing This tells rsync to skip creating files (including directories) that do not exist yet on the destination. If this option is combined with the --ignore-existing option, no files will be updated (wh

Re: Just delete extraneous files, without updating other changes?

2012-02-16 Thread Kevin Korb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Actually, you want --delete --ignore-non-existing and --ignore-existing On 02/16/12 20:55, Kevin Korb wrote: > You want --ignore-existing > > On 02/16/12 20:36, Bryan Pliatsios wrote: >> Hello all, > >> I thought --recursive and --delete-before m

Re: Just delete extraneous files, without updating other changes?

2012-02-16 Thread Kevin Korb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You want --ignore-existing On 02/16/12 20:36, Bryan Pliatsios wrote: > Hello all, > > I thought --recursive and --delete-before might be an option and > I can quit rsync when it begins the updates, but the incremental > recursive scanning is disab

Just delete extraneous files, without updating other changes?

2012-02-16 Thread Bryan Pliatsios
Hello all, I thought --recursive and --delete-before might be an option and I can quit rsync when it begins the updates, but the incremental recursive scanning is disabled and this will certainly crash rsync as it was before moving to v3.x (too many files). I have no experience with -

Re: Fwd: Re: cwRsync got killed...

2012-02-16 Thread Joachim Otahal (privat)
AGH ! I postet the wrong checksums, I posted the ones for cwRsync_4.2.0_Installer.zip instead of cwRsyncServer_4.2.0_Installer.zip cwRsyncServer_4.2.0_Installer.zip: MD5: c787dfa854775793d1a1b5c3502b57b5 SHA-256: 21e608caed9e5e7e1f1f9881729eab0a8fce6e1ff31d85dcb7759d502478160c The checksums ar

Fwd: Re: cwRsync got killed...

2012-02-16 Thread Joachim Otahal (privat)
A bit late, but someone (anonymous) provided a link to download. the md5 is correct, it matches the last sourceforge state. And the md5 and sha256 mentioned at https://www.itefix.no/i2/node/12862 - before he gave up the project. MD5 c787dfa854775793d1a1b5c3502b57b5 sha256 5abeec588e937bd749456d

Support for a (new?) backup concept

2012-02-16 Thread Jens Stimpfle
I've had an idea for a backup concept that could be new, or at least I have not been able to find anything similar on the net. It's something like a "reversed rsync", although this term is already commonly used for "backup restoration". The goal is to get the best of both pull and push backup meth

Re: name too long problem?

2012-02-16 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > filename overflows max-path len by 1: > Count the characters in the displayed and you'll see what the max_path value is. That message is output by the sender, and indicates names that are too long to put into the stream of file-list dat