Wayne, This is the bug: That is stated poorly. And it is not invalid at all.
-----Original Message----- From: rsync-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:rsync-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of samba-b...@samba.org Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 19:19 To: rsync...@samba.org Subject: [Bug 8844] rsyncd ownership handling https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8844 Wayne Davison <way...@samba.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison <way...@samba.org> 2012-08-12 17:18:51 UTC --- Taken from the rsyncd.conf manpage: uid This parameter specifies the user name or user ID that file transfers to and from that module should take place as when the daemon was run as root. That is stated poorly in that it is trying to say that the process runs as that user. The gid parameter is similar. Both default to running the process as "nobody", which has no rights to chown files to other users. So, if you want to preserve ownership, you must run the receiving process as root, or perhaps settle for fake-super storing ownership info as xattrs (which will only be useful for people reading the files via rsync). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html