On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:38:35 -0400, Selva Nair wrote:
As with any dedup solution, performance does take a hit and its often
not worth it unless you have a lot of duplication in the data.
This is so only in some volumes in our case, but it appears that zfs
permits this to be enabled/disabled
yeah, i read somewhere that zfs DOES have separate tuning for metadata
and data cache, but i need to read up on that more.
as for heavy block duplication: daily backups of the whole system = alot of
dupe.
/kc
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 05:42:32PM +, Andrew Gideon said:
On Mon, 13 Jul
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 08:59:25 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
btrfs has support for this: you make a backup, then create a btrfs
snapshot of the filesystem (or directory), then the next time you make a
new backup with rsync, use --inplace so that just changed parts of the
file are written to the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448
--- Comment #2 from John Pierman haqt...@gmail.com ---
tested with 3.07 and 3.1 with --ignore-case patch applied
cd /tmp
mkdir -p a/b/c/d/e/f
mkdir -p A/b/C/D/e/F
add some files to a/b/c/d/e/f/
rsync -r --ignore-case a/ A/
creates b/c/d/e/f/files
Anyone out there feel like contributing to this feature?
It appears it was marked assigned for 3.1.1 but I didn't see any movement.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Wayne Davison way...@samba.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:48 AM, John
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448
--- Comment #3 from John Pierman haqt...@gmail.com ---
Because you're not running it on a case-ignoring filesystem. That patch is
(sadly) only a partially effective set of changes that helps rsync to deal with
a filesystem that doesn't
Andrew Gideon c182driv...@gideon.org wrote:
btrfs has support for this: you make a backup, then create a btrfs
snapshot of the filesystem (or directory), then the next time you make a
new backup with rsync, use --inplace so that just changed parts of the
file are written to the same blocks
