Re: Rsync sends again already existing files

2023-06-30 Thread Kevin Korb via rsync
You should also read about --inplace. Without it --no-whole-file you are telling it to do all the extra data diffing only to write out an entire new file anyway (just using data from source and target to create it). On 6/30/23 21:29, Selva Nair via rsync wrote: So this disable a lot

Re: Rsync sends again already existing files

2023-06-30 Thread Selva Nair via rsync
> > So this disable a lot of interest in Rsync :-( Isn't there a way to > disable > "--whole-file"? > "--no-whole-file" should do it though for local copies, forcing delta transfer is not going to speed up anything in most cases. Selva -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting

Re: Rsync sends again already existing files

2023-06-30 Thread Perry Hutchison via rsync
Stephane Ascoet via rsync wrote: > Kevin Korb le 29/06/2023 22:43: > > Are you so sure rsync actually copies the file? It should > > correct the timestamp and tell you it did. > > Of that what it should do! But I'm sure not: the target is a very > low-quality-and-performance USB key ... less

Re: Rsync sends again already existing files

2023-06-30 Thread Stephane Ascoet via rsync
Kevin Korb le 29/06/2023 22:43: -i, -v, and --progress all only affect the output. Bonjour, of course I know ;-) adds a header and footer and --progress of course adds the per-file progress bar. Thanks, that what I wanted to know, so I keep them all. as those 2 options are very