On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 06:58:57PM -0600, Jay Strauss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 20Gb of data I need to back up. It takes too copy it across
> the internet. Is there a way I can copy it locally to some removable
> media like a couple of DVDs, then bring them to the target machine,
> copy onto the t
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:17:05PM +, Suresh Govindachar wrote:
>
> Responding to the question of how to use the batch file
> /e/cmds/foo created via the command:
>
> > rsync -a --only-write-batch=/e/cmds/foo /c/home/wer/work/ /e/gold
>
> to selectively restore a subdirectory of wor
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:21:43PM -0400, Mike Jackson wrote:
> Looking for more efficient replication or synchronization solution
> than rsync, take a look at syncdat by www.dataexpedition.com
Hi Mike,
You seem to have a misunderstanding about what qualifies as
on-topic for the rsync maili
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 11:38:25AM -0700, Joe Peterson wrote:
> WARNING: jukebox/Frank_Sinatra/The_Main_Event/04-Let_Me_Try_Again.flac
> failed verification -- update discarded (will try again).
>
> What does the "WARNING" imply? What could have gone wrong? I cannot
> reproduce it. When I did a
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:30:49AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 10:32:50AM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > If the original file changes, then so will the hard link.
>
> No -- an rsync update creates a temporary file, and that file gets
> renamed into p
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:52:40PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > Are you saying only unchanged files are available as alternate basis
> > files? If we can, I think it's worth avoiding this restriction.
>
> If we were to use the files directly, then it would be complicated to
> try to order the
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:37:48PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 05:03:30PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Yeah, I think I'm saying just treat (1) and (2) the same way. OTOH,
> > if the behavior is optional and documented, I could definitely see
&g
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:01:35PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:04:34PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > That option should imply at least, --checksum and --delete-after if
> > --delete at all.
>
> I don't think it needs --checksum because rs
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:07:51PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:12:30PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
>
> >>The first pass of "rename-without-modification" co
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:12:30PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> The first pass of "rename-without-modification" could even be much easier:
> size and timestamp should match.
Eeek. That's a bit too risky for my tastes.
I'd be comfortable with "Size && timestamp && (checksum || filename)"
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 03:02:51PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> I use rsync for backing up user data, profiles, important network shares
> etc. (from several locations over WAN).
>
> Overall it works flawlessly, as it transfers only changes, but sometimes
> there are some serious hiccups.
Wayne,
The link to the the 2.6.5 Release NEWS is broken.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 06:38:44AM -0400, Kent Miller wrote:
> Dear Sir or Madam,
> Has anyone seen a error message like the following?
>
> rsync: recv_generator: mkdir "/home/kmiller/briefcase/1205275" failed: Too
> many links (31)
> rsync: stat "/home/kmiller/briefcase/1205275" failed: No
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 09:32:44PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:23:24PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Additional Comm
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:23:24PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-15 16:23 ---
> Created an attachment (id=1448)
> --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:45:00AM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote:
> When using --backup, the sequence (as monitored by strace) is:
>
>rename("/path/to/", "/")
>rename("/path/to/..xx", "/path/to/")
>
> This, of course, leaves a momentary window wherein can't be found.
> Might
> it be pos
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:20:37PM -0400, Poe, David wrote:
> We have nearly 200 GB of data in a production Oracle database broken up
> into about 100 files of 2 GB. The database incurrs a 5% change per week
> in the form of new data, no modification nor deletions. I need to copy
> this data from
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:26:39PM +0200, Martin Kammerlander wrote:
> Zitat von Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:36:05AM +0200, Martin Kammerlander wrote:
> > > hi all!
> > >
> > > I tried to synch
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:36:05AM +0200, Martin Kammerlander wrote:
> hi all!
>
> I tried to synchronise a directory with the following command:
>
> rsync -avz --exclude "db/" /source/ /destination/folder/ --delete
>
> The source has 3 subfolders one of them is not necessary for to synchronize
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 06:19:08PM +0100, Nick Burrett wrote:
> The attached patch provides an additional check for the checksumming
> mode to ensure that a file that is actually written out to disk can be
> read back and has the same MD4 sum as the file on at the originating
> location.
I'm no
I had occasion this morning to apply rsync to another task. As usual,
the docs were informative, the functionality I needed was easily
supported, and rsync worked like a charm.
Of course, all this is the result of a lot of hard work by the rsync
developers, especially Wayne. I decided it would
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:01:52PM -0800, Richard Patterson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Andrew Trigdell's original rsync paper (actually
> thesis) discussed the idea of using rsync to make
> incremental tape backups based not on whole files but
> rather parts of files. Sadly, this functionality is
> not a
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:08:45AM +, Alun wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > If the log file is e.g. 2Gbytes long and has only had 100Kbytes appended
> > > since the last rsync, then using -
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:23:05PM -0800, Mark Winslow wrote:
> Hi, is there a way to have rsync prune files that
> exist on the destination path that no longer exist on
> the source path?
Yes, there is. Please see the excellent documentation that comes with
rsync.
>
> Thanks.
>
You're welco
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:36:51AM +, Alun wrote:
>
> I think this is a related question (if not identical) to one I asked some
> time back. If you're synchronising log files, for example, then you may be
> able to guarantee that all changes to the file happen at the end of it.
> Unfortunately
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:35:51AM -0700, Tim Conway wrote:
> If it is, as you say, uncompressed, rsync will work on it as-is, finding
> and sending the changes.
That was exactly my first thought, but I think he was meaning to say
that the file's contents were 2GB when uncompressed, not that the
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 11:04:32AM -0500, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
>
> I agree that exclude/include patters can be tricky, and you have a good
> point about familiarity versus complexity. I think what makes them hard
> to handle is the fact that we are dealing with filename (and directory
> na
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 08:50:10PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> of the "right path", but I won't be convinced until Wayne starts
> *deleting* man page text, because rsync's pattern matching can be
> fully explained in, say, one or two paragraphs.
that sho
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 03:42:25PM -0500, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> >If I understand Wayne's design, it would be possible to invent a
> >(per-directory) "hook" rule, whose value is executed, and whose stdout
> >is parsed as a [i
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:25:06AM -0500, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
>
> Oooh, I see we are getting a little ambitious, aren't we? ;-)
> [suggestion to use 'find' syntax]
If I understand Wayne's design, it would be possible to invent a
(per-directory) "hook" rule, whose value is executed, and whos
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:57:21AM -0600, Dave Whitinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 11:50 AM, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> > Look at "batch mode." Except it actually applys changes, too.
>
> Thank you, Chris!
>
> That's excellent that most of the code is
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 07:41:36AM -0600, Dave Whitinger wrote:
> I've been using rsync to remotely backup my MySQL databases
> (totalling over 3 gigabytes) and it works nice and fast.
>
> Now I'm trying to setup my system to save yesterday's backup
> before applying today's backup, but it's not r
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 01:32:58PM +0100, Tony Mobily wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a bit of a problem - I have the feeling the solution is
> ridicolously trivial, and yet I can't find it!
>
> I have a remote repository of text files. Until today, I was the only
> one changing those files: I wou
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:54:19AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> - Also removed the (offset > 2*CHUNK_SIZE) check in map_ptr().
> (Did you leave this in for a reason?)
>
only because I had no idea why it was there... :)
-chris
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:54:19AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 06:16:05PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Attached is a patch that makes window strides constant when files are
> > walked with a constant block size. In these cases, it completely
> >
Attached is a patch that makes window strides constant when files are
walked with a constant block size. In these cases, it completely
avoids all memmoves.
In my simple local test of rsyncing 57MB of 10 local files, memmoved
bytes went from 18MB to zero.
I haven't tested this for a big variety o
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 06:20:11PM -0700, Linda A. W. wrote:
> If I use the "-I" to ignore date and size as quick-check methods of
> determining
just modtime. rsync never ignores size differences.
> change, what method does it use to determine difference? If it falls
> back to
> checksumming
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:57:58AM -0700, Steve Bonds wrote:
> > HP-UX?
>
> Alas, no. The mkstemp man page suggests using tmpfile() instead, which
> generally means that HP won't fix any problems.
>
> - mktemp(3C)
> Remarks:
> These functions are provided solely for backward compat
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 03:23:44PM -0700, Steve Bonds wrote:
> I've been able to duplicate this problem using the CVS version of rsync
> that was current as of about 2000 UTC today (July 27 2004)
That's some good detective work, Steve!
-chris
>
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 07:01:12PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 06:36:27PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > And don't forget the hard-link post-processing -- it would also need to
> > happen after the receiver finished its job.
>
> Ok, it'
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 06:36:27PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 03:54:11PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > What data exactly? I thought:
> > 1) all recv-to-gen communications went through the error_pipe[] fds.
>
> Yes, that became true when I
tests fail, you will see rather more output. The scratch
directory will remain in the build directory. It would be useful if
#! /bin/sh
# Copyright (C) 2004 by Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# This program is distributable under the terms of the GNU GPL (see
# COPYING).
# Test r
Geesh, I forgot the attachment, (again).
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 03:54:11PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:10:22AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 06:18:49PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> > avoid this and also to separate
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:10:22AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 06:18:49PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Ok, how about this: Instead of index notification, run the generator
> > and receiver serially.
>
> I had wondered about that too, but th
helps to attach, eh?
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 06:18:49PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 08:37:03PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 06:20:59PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > > Could a simplified version of this index notificati
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 08:37:03PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 06:20:59PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Could a simplified version of this index notification take place over
> > the existing error-pipe pair?
>
> The data is traveling in the o
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 08:58:43PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 06:20:59PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 05:25:18PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > > So, perhaps we should go ahead and save off the exclude list in the
> >
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 05:25:18PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Seems like the two choices we have are:
>
> (1) Force the excludes into the batch file and read them in the local-
> to-local batch-reading transfer.
>
> (2) Require the user to re-specify the excludes if they want the same
> upda
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 03:54:31AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 08:20:51PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:06:28PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > > + max_map_size = MIN(MAX_MAP_SIZE, blength * 32);
> >
> > This
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:06:28PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 06:27:45PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > My initial reaction (having not actually read the code) is that it would
> > be desirable make the window_size highly composite, and then ensure tha
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:07:36PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I did some work refining your patch a little, and liked the result so
> much I went ahead and checked it into CVS. I'd appreciate it if you
> could give my changes a look to see if I messed anything up.
>
> The most important chang
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:07:36PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I did some work refining your patch a little, and liked the result so
> much I went ahead and checked it into CVS. I'd appreciate it if you
> could give my changes a look to see if I messed anything up.
>
> The most important chang
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:53:56PM -0400, Loukinas, Jeremy wrote:
> For some reason when using -owner -group my files end up being nobody:nobody
> on the destination..?
> This is Solaris 9.
>
> Jeremy S. Loukinas
>
You need to provide much more information. command line? version? et
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 02:01:41PM +, Guo jing wrote:
> I install rsync in computer and run it as a daemon successfully, but when I
> run rsync command on another end to connect it. There is a error.
>
> The output is :
> opening tcp connection to 192.168.0.43 port 873
> r
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:06:49AM -0400, Linux wrote:
> I get the same error even after taking the advise from the subsequent
> posts to this message and other message stateing "error in rsync
> protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165)" .
>
> The one thing that i have noticed is that is only
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 08:47:57PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote:
>
> > But, the comment seems to have been right on. I have re-run the
> > experiment with block sizes as small as 3000 (yes it took a long
> > time to complete) all the way up to block sizes of 10 with it
> > working in reasonable
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 10:13:28AM +0100, Stuart Halliday wrote:
>
> Why isn't there a beginners guide to setting up rsync?
>
>
> The rsync front page talks of a tutorial by devshed at:
> http://www.devshed.com/c/b/Administration#/Rsync/page1.html
>
> Except there isn't one
>
> It's now:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 11:03:12PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote:
> "Wallace Matthews" writes:
>
> > I copy the 29 Gig full backup back into fedor//test/Kibbutz and issue
> > the command "time rsync -avv --rsh=rsh --stats --block-size=181272
> > /test/Kibbutz/Kbup_1 fedor://test/Kibbutz" and it CRAWL
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 01:35:28PM -0400, Wallace Matthews wrote:
> When I dont specify --block-size but have --write-batch=xxx, I get a xxx.rsync_csum
> file that is 76 Kbytes in size.
> The size of the file varies as the size of the "reference" file is varied. --stats
> showed matched data that
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 09:39:04AM -0700, Marshall28 wrote:
> Recently I've found out about rsync and wanted to use this to mirror local
> disks on one of my servers. I first ran Ghost for Linux to get the exact
> clone I was looking for, and now I'm ready to setup rsync to keep my drives
> mirrore
ion of rsync with my recent
batch-mode rewrite patch. It has a little different (better) interface,
and it does work in the case you describe.
It would be interesting to see the results of your block-size
measurements.
-chris
> wally
>
> -Original Message-
> From: C
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 09:14:55AM +1000, Dan Goodes wrote:
> Hi Again,
>
> On Thu, 27 May 2004 at 09:52, Dan Goodes wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > For some time, we've been having some issues with our mirroring with
> > rsync. The symptoms are a broken transfer, with the 'cryptic' error
> > mess
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 04:55:31PM -0400, Robert Caskey wrote:
> I got this mail from a cronjob and can't figure out what is causing
> rsync to crap out on me. I received the message at 5:03, when the cron
> job is scheduled to run at 4:00, so total runtime is approximately an
> hour.
>
> Machi
I've attached an update to the man page regarding batch mode. I didn't
change the statement about batch mode being experimental, but maybe we
should consider modifying it.
It did serve well to manage my expectations when I first tried batch
mode and found that it didn't work at all for use
There it goes...
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:16:45AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 04:40:39PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Do you see any reason to keep FIXED_CHECKSUM_SEED around? It doesn't
> > hurt anthing, but I don't see a use for it.
>
Wayne,
Do you see any reason to keep FIXED_CHECKSUM_SEED around? It doesn't
hurt anthing, but I don't see a use for it.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:47:30PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> Ok. "diff -cu" it is. I used -b because the auto-tab feature
> in emacs sometimes causes noisy whitespace changes in the diff.
>
> I'll incorporate your comments and rediff.
>
Ok, actuall
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 07:11:04PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:47:30PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:34:38PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > > Another thing I noticed was that a local --write-batch copy behaved as
>
Wayne,
A couple more thoughts:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:34:38PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> First, a summary of my thoughts:
>
> One thought here: would it make things simpler to separate the option-
> parsing variables (read_batch & write_batch) from a set of variables
> that would
gt;
Thanks for your thorough review and quick feedback!
> Some other comments:
>
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 06:08:04PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > 1) I suspect one area in client_run() is non-portable.
>
> I assume you mean the use of /dev/null. That idiom is use
Wayne,
Please consider the attached patch. This applies to the current
CVS, and is independant of patches/local-batch.diff. As a matter of
fact, I'm sure it would conflict heavily with local-batch.diff.
This version of batch mode has a couple distinguishing features:
Write-batch
The attached patch adds some whitespace to the recv_files() function
declaration, and renames variable 'f' to 'f_out' in generate_files().
Index: generator.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/rsync/generator.c,v
retrieving revision 1.93
diff -b -
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:01:25PM +0400, Ilya N. Golubev wrote:
> > Am I correct in guessing that 01:32 is _during_ the rsync run?
>
> No. The file in src dir was updated before rsync run, and became
> newer than one in dest dir.
Does rsync version 2.6.2 exhibit this same behavior?
-chris
> -
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 07:50:51PM +0400, Ilya N. Golubev wrote:
> rsync version 2.4.6 protocol version 24
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> rsync -avv ~/share/cvs-xemacs-head/XEmacs/xemacsweb
> ~/share/public_html/xemacsweb
> building file list ... done
>
> ...
>
> xemacsweb/About/XEmacsServices.conte
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 07:20:40PM +0200, Karsten Scheibler wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 05:22:19PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 03:11:17PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > > > Is this fixed by the "|| read_batch" [...] whi
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 05:22:19PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 03:11:17PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Is this fixed by the "|| read_batch" [...] which is in CVS?
>
> Yes. That extra code makes --read-batch default to --no-whole-file,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 03:48:16PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 09:57:13PM +0200, Karsten Scheibler wrote:
> > delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
>
> That's because of a long-standing bug in batch mode. Specify
> --no-whole-file to work around
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 09:57:13PM +0200, Karsten Scheibler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to use the --read/write-batch options, but i have problems to do so.
> The shell script [1] leads to the following error:
>
> [sender] expand file_list to 131072 bytes, did move
> delta-transmission disabled fo
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:20:57AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 07:09:46PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > I hope you have the time to review this patch and comment.
>
> The patch looks good on first inspection. I don't like the change to
>
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 09:50:22AM +0100, Stuart Halliday wrote:
> > Logically, this is correct behaviour, I think.
> >
> > dump/* is a wildcard that matches every _existing_ local file in the
> > dump/ directory. Since the file you deleted doesn't exist, it isn't
> > considered by rsync.
> >
>
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 10:11:19AM -0400, Anh Truong wrote:
> Hi
>
> I use rsync to perform backup on disk on a SunFire 880 with Solaris 8. For
> performance issues, we launch simultaneously 5 rsyncs on 5 different fliesystems
> and about 150-200 "cp -p" commands on as many database files. We ha
Wayne,
It's taken a little while for me to get more familiar with the
code, but I think I've reached a good breakpoint in improving
batch-mode. Let me highlight some of the changes in the
attached patch:
* --write-batch and --read-batch arguments are no lon
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:16:19PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
> Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I am making an extraordinary claim: rysnc seems to copy all my files,
> >>not just ones that have changed or new files.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Use
t of
> 29 Gig) and it only completed ~50 Meg of transfer of the 1.3 Gig in a couple of
> hours.
>
> Chris Shoemaker suggests this is a problem with the sliding window being a
> fixed size of 256k and that the block size will not allow multiple blocks in
> the window size.
Er, t
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:30:16PM +0800, Jason Potter wrote:
> Hi There,
>
>
>
> This post is brought about due to the following two:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10702.html
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10709.html
>
>
>
> I have a situation
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:37:25PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:30:04PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Do any "rsync developers" care to confirm/deny? [...] I've used rsync
> > over NFS with no problems.
>
> It has been said
Wayne,
That's great stuff. What do you think about a cut-n-paste of this example and
explanation into the documentation somewhere?
-Chris
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:02:17PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:16:30AM -0400, Collins, Kevin wrote:
> > Number of files: 161530
>
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:34:46PM +0100, Andrew Smith-MAGAZINES wrote:
> My personal preference was to mount a share from the file server on the client and
> essentially do the sync all locally on the client but rsync doesn't seem to like
> doing this very much (apparently this is advised agains
Um,
I don't remember the exact checkout command line I used, but it was
probably something like the instructions on the web page:
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot rsync
anyway, how do I update?
I tried:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rsync]$ cvs update -d -P
cvs [update aborted]: connect to pse
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 03:37:21PM +0100, ww m-pubsyssamba wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a requirement to script a sync from a server to a UNIX workstation (Mac
> OS X) users desktop and profile related data at logon and
> logoff. Rsync looks like it may be appropriate, but I am concerned
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 12:05:09AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:34:18AM +0800, Jiang Wensheng wrote:
> > I am using a computer to back up files from another computer
> > automatically. I want to exclude large files from backing up. How can
> > I do that?
>
> Either crea
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 02:53:53PM -0400, Wallace Matthews wrote:
> I am seeing some rather strange behavior with synch of 2 directories on the same
> system using 2.6.2.
>
> The older file is the image of a full backup and is 29Gig in size. The new image is
> a slice of an incremental
> backup
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:50:11PM -0700, Swarbrick Software wrote:
> I have noticed that if you run two rsyncs at once, they get confused and
> copy the files from one the wrong rsync thread. Apparently this is because
> of the ?Build List? that is made in ram. Two build lists stepping on each
> o
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:55:37AM +0200, Pascal Nobus wrote:
> This is the case
>
> - mounted Inetpub's windows-webserver on /mnt/web1 /mnt/web2, etc.
> - rsync this to local dir:
> rsync -av --delete /mnt/web1 /mass/kuurne/day
> rsync -av --delete /mnt/web2 /mass/kuurne/day
> e
in send_file_name(), there is:
if (write_batch)
file->flags |= FLAG_TOP_DIR;
Can anyone explain this? It results in the file flags sent to the
batch file differing from the ones sent to the recevier by that one
bit. But, why?
-chris
--
To unsubscribe or change
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:11:51AM -0400, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
>
> Wayne Davison wrote:
> >
> >I'm wondering if batch mode should be removed from the main rsync
> >release and relegated to a parallel project? It seems to me that a
> >better feature for the mainstream utility would be somet
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:06:52AM -0400, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> > Indeed, what you describe seems to have been the design motivation.
> > I
> >can share what my desired application is: I want to create a mirror of a
> >publi
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 09:42:18PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 05:18:10PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > BTW, there is a work-around. If you don't mind duplicating the mirror
> > twice, one solution is to do a regular (no --write-batch) rsync up
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 08:10:57PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 05:18:10PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > The "knowledge" or "memory" of that exact state is more likely to
> > reside with the receiver (who just left that state) than
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:15:23AM -0400, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> to put things in the right prespective, you should read (if you haven't
> done so already) the original paper describing the design behind batch
> mode. The design and implementation of this functionality goes ba
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
