Re: Changing only file permissions

a carefully crafted hash > collision) and it even checksums file that only exist on one (or the > other) end of the connection even though there is no file on the other > end to compare the checksum to. What a waste of time. > > On 04/22/2015 03:57 AM, Hendrik Visage wrote: &g

Re: Changing only file permissions

g from that storage then --checksum > might actually be useful. > > On 04/22/2015 01:59 AM, Hendrik Visage wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:03 AM, James Moe >> wrote: Hello, opensuse 13.2 linux v3.16.7-7-desktop x86_64 rsync >> v3.1.1 >> >> I used rsync to

Re: Changing only file permissions

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:03 AM, James Moe wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > opensuse 13.2 > linux v3.16.7-7-desktop x86_64 > rsync v3.1.1 > > I used rsync to copy /usr/ to another volume with these options: > - --recursive --one-file-system --links --st

Re: Re: encrypted rsyncd - why was it never implemented?

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:20 PM, wrote: > from a security perspective this is bad. think of a backup provider who wants > to make rsyncd modules available to the end users so they can push backups to > the server. do you think that such server is secure if all users are allowed > to open up an

Re: strange behavior of --inplace on ZFS

Question: The source and destination folder host OS and are both sides ZFS? I'd like to see some stats that rsync said it transfered, also add the -S flag as an extra set of tests. The other Question that would be interested (both with and without -S) is when you use the dd if=/dev/urandom create

Re: rsyncssl

On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:07 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > Isn`t RsyncSSL (wrap rsync with stunnel via stdin/out) the better solution > ? (as it is using a mature external program for the SSL stuff) > Why SSL when you already have a proper working SSH with certificates etc. that should be as good if n

Re: Low performance

On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:32 PM, R. Pietsch wrote: > I try to capture such a rsync-stream with wireshark. Hmmm... receiving or transmitting side? I *assume* the transmitting side given the time difference between the packets and their ACKs. > the times are for example: > 10.510155 for the rsync-

Re: Low performance

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:42 PM, R. Pietsch wrote: > > Hi! > > I do a rsync between 2 machines. The throughput is only 2 MByte/Sec. > > Each machine is a Supermicro server with >    2 x 8 Core Opteron 6128 >    64 GByte of ECC RAM >    1 LSI MegaRAID SAS 9280-24i4e >    24 x 2TByte SATA Disks as a

Re: rsync and encryption

Hi, If paranoid on the data you'll be syncing: Setup ssh on both sides, and use rsync over ssh. If it's just the data that might get corrupted or somebody getting to the data laterz: I believe the rsync authentication is good enough, so add a password for the rsync daemon's shares. Hendrik O

Re: After successfull passwordless ssh login, unable to do rsync

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Boniforti Flavio wrote: > Hello again... > >> > I have to say that on a similar setup, I'm succeeding with >> the command >> > I told you before. >> >> Then you are using the rsync daemon method, and you will have >> to check on the server side to allow access with

Re: After successfull passwordless ssh login, unable to do rsync

"rsync rsync://host" is different from "rsync -e ssh path host:/path" using ssh, you want the 2nd form On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Boniforti Flavio wrote: > Hello everybody. > > I got a strange problem, which I hope to solve with your help. > > I'm doing "remote backups" using rsync in an s

Re: Parallel rsync's for better Performance.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > No. That's a fundamental problem with ANY rotating media device. > > I don't say say that you can't build something for the people that have > that kind of hardware, or that are constrainted by high bandwidth & > latency network con

Re: please help me using rsync efficiently

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:11 PM, wrote: > But i want rsync to copy the files the way the files and links are in the > list file. > Is it possible with rsync? > If so how is it possible? Do it one file+link at a time, very inefficient--- but what is the reason behind the way you want it? -- Ple

Re: which server to make client and which the server for rsync.

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Rahul Nabar wrote: > > Are there design / performance considerations that influence which > machine is made the server and which the client? > benchmark it ;) > Also, Is the rsync daemon the preferred way to o this backup? I can > also cross mount via nfs. Wou

Re: Why are files synced again and again when not using -a?

perhaps using Windows or FAT32 type filesystems? On 3/30/09, André Hänsel wrote: > > Hi, > > usually I use rsync with -a but recently I used it without this option and > discovered that the same files are synced over and over again (as shown by > -v). Of course the rsync algorithm avoids the traf

Re: 24, file has vanished

lnet.org > > -- > Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. > To unsubscribe or change options: > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > Before posting, read: > http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html<http://www.catb.org/%7E

Re: Rsync via two ssh tunnels possible (standard method mentioned k times not possible?)

--sender? > > thanks, roman > -- > Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. > To unsubscribe or change options: > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > Before posting, read: > http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Rsync & parallelizing it for files in same directory

tures of these systems, as I know, but it doesn't help preaching to rocks -- Hendrik Visage -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: Trouble with rsync inside fcron: buffer overflow in recv_exclude_list

On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 11:58:39PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 09:41:49PM +0200, Hendrik Visage wrote: > > /usr/bin/rsync --delete-after --max-delete=1 -pogtvS /var/spool/mail/* > > /md7/mail_backup/`date "+%H"`/ > > Drop the '

Trouble with rsync inside fcron: buffer overflow in recv_exclude_list

Hi, Using the following script (which runs fine as root in a terminal), I get the error below. Any ideas where to continue searching? sh-2.05b$ rsync --version rsync version 2.6.2 protocol version 28 Copyright (C) 1996-2004 by Andrew Tridgell and others Capabilities: