Hi,
Please send all RsyncX questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
Kevin Boyd
OS X Deployment Coordinator
Sys Adm UMIT Contract Services
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Johan Glimming wrote:
> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:45:03 +0100
> From: Johan Glimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: rsync@lists.samba.org
> Sub
Here's another method for HFS+ rsyncs to non-HFS+ filesystems - the files
can be synced and restored without using RsyncX:
http://xnews.soad.umich.edu/RsyncX_Forums/index.php?topic=33.0
There have been varying degrees of happiness with this method. It's not
perfect, just another alternative meth
RsyncX questions should be sent to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin Boyd
OS X Deployment Coordinator
Sys Adm UMIT Contract Services
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Sean M. Kaiser wrote:
> Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 08:10:59 -0400
> From: Sean M. Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: "Bad addre
What message was sent to the log?
If you are using a version of rsync that uses the '--eahfs' flag, then it
should not matter if files are moved or removed during a sync.
Kevin Boyd
OS X Deployment Coordinator
Sys Adm UMIT Contract Services
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Jason Ferguson wrote:
> Date: Mo
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> I have no desire to see the current protocol get explicit IDs. I think
> it would be better to simply ensure that the lists sort identically on
> each side, and the best way to do that is to ensure that both sides sort
> the exact same list.
>
I agree
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, D Andrew Reynhout wrote:
>
> Yes. I forgot to mention it, but for the moment, I'm accepting
> the loss of creator/type, icon, etc. For now, all of that requires
> manual repair upon restoration. I would have tried to shoehorn it
> in, but I haven't thought of a way to do it
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, D Andrew Reynhout wrote:
>
> On HFS+, a resource fork for is accessed via
> /..namedfork/rsrc . Obviously, we can't send the
> same filename to the destination, because an inode can't be
> a regular file and a directory simultaneously.
>
> Map: /..namedfork/rsrc
> to: .~~
Boyd
OS X Deployment Coordinator
Sys Adm UMIT Contract Services
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Catalino Cuadrado wrote:
> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:34:37 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Catalino Cuadrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Kevin Alexander Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Catalino Cu
Hi,
Is the version of rsync on both local and remote machines the version that
supports HFS+? And are both source and destination filesystems HFS+? This
is the only way for this version to work correctly.
Kevin Boyd
OS X Deployment Coordinator
Sys Adm UMIT Contract Services
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002
ts, and this form of cross-platform support of rsync for
HFS+ volumes could be implemented.
Kevin Boyd
OS X Deployment Coordinator
Sys Adm UMIT Contract Services
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Joseph Annino wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 17:55:30 -0400
> From: Joseph Annino <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
I'd like to either supply binaries or add source to the rsync tree. The
source is located here:
http://www.macosxlabs.org/rsyncx/rsync-2.5.5.hfs.tgz
It cleanly compiles for all supported platforms, and adds HFS+ filesystem
support for OSX. All HFS+ specific code is noted, and 'ifdef'ed wh
11 matches
Mail list logo