If you only want a file (or directory) just complete the link that Ed gave you:
> cdimage.debian.org::cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/[name of the
> file/directory] /YOUR_DOWNLOAD_DIR/
Le 17 déc. 2010 à 07:42, shirish शिरीष a écrit :
> In-line :-
>
> 2010/12/17 :
>
>
>
>> None of 4 Tai
Hi,
This error could probably come from the drop of an unstable network connection.
Check my recent post about it:
http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg26280.html
In my case, the solution was to use rsync over a ssh tunnel. The ssh tunnel is
more robust about network problems t
Le 30 sept. 10 à 11:39, andreas.moro...@sb-brixen.it a écrit :
Verify the user doing the transfer have write access on the
sprengel module.
Hello,
do you mean the user on the client ( while testing it is root )
on the server where I started rsync as daemon as root
or does it change group a
Le 29 sept. 10 à 22:35, Henri Shustak a écrit :
I'm looking for a way to deliberately copy a large directory tree
of files somewhat slowly, rather than as fast as the hardware
will allow.
Just do it to localhost - that way it's still a network
connection, and
you can use "--bwlimit". Also,
Hi,
If you are able to rsync over ssh, this connection may be more robust than
plain rsync protocol. See
http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg26280.html
Best regards,
Vitorio
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change
Hi,
I'm not an rsync expert, other people will confirm or infirm what I'm
saying, but I think your problem is that you are using rsync in "stand-
alone" mode to copy from and to the same computer. Although that
works, in this way rsync won't use it's delta algorithm and so, won't
have grea
Paul Slootman a écrit :
On Thu 16 Sep 2010, Mac User FR wrote:
I read somewhere that the ssh connection was stronger than rsync one
in unstable networks. And effectively, if I run rsync via ssh ( -e
option), the transfer happen without errors, on the same computer
using the same networking setup
Hi!
Interesting subject. Since a week now I'm trying to solve the same
problem on a very precise configuration.
In my company we have some wired computers and some wireless ones. All
of them under Windows XP SP3 with all security updates. They are
backed up in a FreeNAS box under FreeNAS
Hi,
rsync only synchronizes one way. If you mean that when you change the
file in location A then you run rsync A to B and when you change the
file in B side, you run a different command rsync B to A, it's OK. If
you want rsync to automatically see which side changed, rsync doesn't
do tha
It's the Easter miracle! :P
Sorry about joking in a serious list, hope you won't get angry.
Although I don't have suggestions about the problem, I'm following the
thread because I'm potentially concerned about rsync on Mac bugs.
Cheers!
Vitorio
Le 6 avr. 10 à 00:09, Robert DuToit a écrit
Oh, sorry, I didn't get that the filesystem to check was the remote one. Now I
get why the solution is so complex.
Le 18 mars 2010 à 18:30, Paul Slootman a écrit :
> On Thu 18 Mar 2010, Mac User FR wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be better to use conditional expressions fro
Wouldn't it be better to use conditional expressions from sh with a
smaller footprint than rsync --list to check if the directory exists?
I think on something like:
-d file
True if file exists and is a directory.
(source: man sh)
Cheers,
Vitorio
Le 18 mars 10 à 17:30, Linux Expert
I don't have any help for the solution of your uid problem, but try upgrading
to a recent rsync version.
1) Download and Install XCode if not already done
2) Download sources from rsync server
3) unzip
4) open a Terminal on the rsync sources folder
5) run "./configure && make"
6) try using the fr
Hello,
Like on any other mounting system, if you run rsync over a mounted ftp
volume, it won't be able to save you a lot of bandwidth with the delta
algorithm as it's not running on both sides of the link.
In another hand, if bandwidth is not your problem, with this method
rsync should (t
I don't know, I was just theoretically guessing.
I don't have a computer on 10.6 so I'm just fine with rsync :)
Le 25 oct. 09 à 18:36, Robert DuToit a écrit :
Hi Vitorio,
Yes -I kind of figured default was that now. What would be the way
to get i386 back:
would
./configure -arch i386 -a
For me this is a problem of gcc config on X.6.
It's targetting x64 by default instead of x86.
Cheers,
Vitorio
Le 25 oct. 09 à 18:19, Robert DuToit a écrit :
Hi All,
I've been off list for a while and just got around to building
rsync 3.0.6 on Mac OSX 10.6 intel core 2 duo machine. It runs
Yes, look at the post-xfer exec option of man rsyncd.
Regards
Le 4 oct. 09 à 00:14, sdcsdc sdcsdc a écrit :
Hi,
I want to transport a bash file with ipfw rules when the file is
updated from PHP program between Ubuntu server and FreeBSD server
via SSH. The problem is that then the bash
I think your problem is with reading the correct size of folders as
there have hard links. To do this with du command, try:
du -sh /home/backup/*
As far as I know, du command will only report the "real" disk size if
the 2 hard links are in the du "scoop". Otherwise, running 2 times du
on th
If the sender OS is OS X, I would guess you are using an rsync patch
that is not fully compliant with the colon to slash conversion.
The patch I did to let rsync copy the resource forks on OS X prior to
Tiger had this problem, that is corrected on the last version.
Completing what Greg wrote:
This is a malloc (memory allocation) error.
It shows that a non-aligned pointer (pointer that doesn't start on an
address multiple of 4 in a 32-bit machine) is being freed. As pointers
must always be aligned, this indicates an error and the function
free() doesn't know how to deal with it. B
Here is the mail from henri.
Best regards,
Vitorio
Début du message réexpédié :
De : henri
Date : 4 juin 2009 00:30:32 HAEC
À : Mac User FR
Objet : Rép : WARNING: . . . .failed verification -- update
discarded (will try again).
I was going to write a daemon to manage suspend and resume
Well, when you backup a running vm disk image 3 cases may happen:
1) From the start of the copy until the end of the copy (or syncing,
doesn't matter) the guest OS did not write anything on disk -> copy
will be OK.
2) The guest OS write something to disk but luckily the copy process
got all
You can't copy the disk image of a vm while the guest OS is running.
Best regards,
Vitorio
Le 3 juin 09 à 18:58, JW a écrit :
A nightly scripted rsync backup job is giving me this error
WARNING: vm/escDebLenny14G-flat.vmdk failed verification -- update
discarded
(will try again).
I've se
I'm not sure (maybe someone else can confirm/infirm?) but I think when
there is a server it is "normal" that there is one process to handle
connexions and one process for each transfer.
Think about many clients connecting to your server. One process will
dialog with all clients (from differen
A simple way to prevent this is to store the backup with a rotating
system and hard-linking files.
You can do it with rsync --link-dest=DIR option and a post-exec script
that moves the backup dir to something like backup-200905241335
In this way if the file got corrupted it won't be hard-link
This seems for me an autorisation problem
"rsync: push_dir#1 "/" (in maps) failed: Permission denied (13)"
Verify that you have enough privileges to read the data you are trying
to.
Le 20 mai 09 à 13:01, Daniel.Li a écrit :
Dear List,
I'm using rsync to sync my data, see below command. And
For me, cygwin 1.7 make rsync usable on Windows. Although hacking with
the UTF-8 dll, cygwin 1.5 limited paths (or file names) to 256
characters. This limitation was too much for me since I use it to
backup user data that can be longer than this. I've read on cygwin
list about performance i
ative
functions of respective OS (which I will have to use to decorate the
software - outside the domain of Rsync) e.g. I will use windows
forms, not if I compile java to binary, ill lose windows forms thing
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Mac User FR
wrote:
Did you try compiling your java co
it makes system calls? I have ported rsync to java (I
used same rolling algorithm but used other hashing) but it isn't
fast enough, seems I have to make a native binary version.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Mac User FR
wrote:
I'm not on the code of rsync, but it is heavily c
Hi folks,
I had some time today so I compiled the modification allowing names
with slashes on the pre-tiger resource fork support patch. This is the
only change, so who already changed the patch by itself doesn't need
to update to this version.
Thanks to Tim for showing us this bug.
Best
Le 25 janv. 09 à 00:53, Jason a écrit :
I've compiled with the ASCII values and everything works as expected.
Cool.
I'm still getting the other error so I'm not sure what has
happened. I'll regenerate the disk image for backupbouncer as
maybe the file has become corrupt.
Which other e
Le 24 janv. 09 à 21:41, Jason a écrit :
I've done some digging around and using the condition
if(unicharName[index]==0x003B) /* == ':' */ we never meet this
case. I tried changing the unicharName[index]==':' and the
subsequent slash unicharName. After rsync is compiled I am able to
han
Le 24 janv. 09 à 08:46, Jason a écrit :
Hi Again,
I may have spoke too soon regarding the second :/ patch. Using the
first patch (non-unicode version) I am able to deal with the :/
issue. However, I've recompiled using the second fix and I am now
getting the error:
rsync: get_xattr_nam
Mag Gam a écrit :
Thanks for the fast response Vitorio.
Do you happen to have a simple example? I been trying to look thru
google but unsuccessful.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Mac User FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mag Gam a écrit :
Is it possible to implement snapshots
Hi guys,
I had a little time and decided to update my patch to be applied on
rsync 3.0.4 without hung or reverse patch error.
NB: I only corrected patching errors, the xattr patch still exactly
the same.
I didn't tested if the issue I explained there still the same or not:
http://lists.sa
The problem with disk image as databases is that data change a lot
into the file.
When you run a system on a disk image, thre is not only new data
appending to the end of the file, but the entire disk image is changing.
Same thing would happen with large Outlook .pst databases.
Rsync nor any o
Hi,
Le 14 août 08 à 12:36, Mojca Miklavec a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Mac User FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
With the patched UTF8 cygwin ( http://www.okisoft.co.jp/esc/utf8-cygwin/
),
it works like a charm for us, with spaces and uppercases. I just
had to set
a ic
Le 19 juil. 08 à 20:13, Matt McCutchen a écrit :
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 15:45 +0200, Mac User FR wrote:
In another hand, don't you think we could add the content of this
script (revised, of course) to make rsync a complete incremental
backup solution without needing 3rd part software? Is
Thanks Matt!! I'm always amazed of the quick and precise answers you
give!
Yes, sorry, I meant push (English isn't my native langage and I always
swap push and pull).
For rsnapshot, OK, I understood now how to connect them. The "post-
xfer exec" I was looking for don't exist on the rsync ma
Hello all,
I've started a MacOS 10.3 Panther xattr project at the begin of the
year. There is already some time that I haven't presented a new
version of rsync10.3xattr_support patch. By this mail I would like to
present my apologies and officially stop this project for many reasons:
- I'
You gave you the answer.
I'm not a security specialist, but by my modest knowledge, rsync
protocol isn't secure at all as all information can be sniffed by
somebody on the network. So the "classic" solution for those who need
encryption is to use ssh wrapper.
On the links of this page: htt
Rsync works on a client/server system. So it's recommended to install
rsync on both machines (your and the server), so you bypass NFS and
connect to the server via rsync protocol. That's the way to use the
delta incremental algorithm.
Le 14 mars 08 à 12:46, Andy Smith a écrit :
Hi list,
42 matches
Mail list logo
