y large batch file size
2) The use of smaller block sizes with large files in conjunction with
batch mode results in a failure, increasing block sizes to a larger value
results in a success
Thoughts?
Matt Van Mater
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Matt Van Mater wrote:
> OK so I re-ran rd
this thread who is still
not convinced there is a problem with rsync?
Thanks
Matt Van Mater
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Matt Van Mater wrote:
> I ran one more test on a separate VM to check and see if rsync would allow
> me to specify block size for a smaller file while using batch mode
lta to get smaller (at the expense of
> longer computation time).
>
> Matt
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Joachim Otahal (privat) wrote:
>
>> Matt Van Mater schrieb:
>>
>>
>>> Alternate assessment - I ran a similar comparison against the two image
&
ugh to 400 MB for me.
I am currently running rdiff with a smaller blocksize to test #1 above,
hopefully that will force the delta to get smaller (at the expense of
longer computation time).
Matt
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Joachim Otahal (privat) wrote:
> Matt Van Mater schrieb:
>
f if that seems to work for
you?", I would have to install that software on over 325 remote servers
over satellite. I would MUCH prefer to not touch the remote servers and be
able to use the existing rsync software.
Matt
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Joachim Otahal (privat) wrote:
>
Infrastructure and Tools
> 2500 Lake Cook Road, Riverwoods IL 60015
> P: 224.405.2896 ericbamba...@discover.com
>
>
>
>
> From: Matt Van Mater
> To:
> Date: 03/20/2012 12:55 PM
> Subject:Batch mode creates huge diffs, bug(s)?
> Sent by:
&g
to use block size with batch mode.
Has anyone experienced this before, am I allowed to specify block size with
batch mode? Any words of wisdom?
Thanks,
Matt Van Mater
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://list
