the rsync code currently does things like:
#ifdef HAVE_UTIMES
do utimes stuff
#elif defined HAVE_UTIME
do utime stuff
#else
fail!
#endif
the problem here is when rsync detects the utimes function. the older utime
code is ifdef-ed away so it isnt available at runtime.
On Thursday 20 March 2008, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Thu 20 Mar 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
I subscribe to this mailing list. Why send me a duplicate copy? I get
more than enough email thank you...
most mailing lists detect such duplicates automatically and dont send out
in such cases
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 21:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello, I'm running an Gentoo distribution on my computer, lately I've
started to get error messages that are rsync related. here is a log of
the output:
[...]
rsync:
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello, I'm running an Gentoo distribution on my computer, lately I've
started to get error messages that are rsync related. here is a log of the
output:
Fetching most recent snapshot
Attempting to fetch file dated: 20080219
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed 20 Feb 22:59 2008 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello, I'm running an Gentoo distribution on my computer, lately I've
started to get error messages that are rsync related. here
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 16:06 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
while anything is possible, i highly doubt it. emerge-webrsync
basically
unpacks a tarball and then uses rsync to copy that src tree to the dest
tree /usr/portage.
[...]
tar
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 22:17 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 16:06 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
tar jxf snapshot-.tar.bz2
cd snapshot-
rsync
On Friday 25 January 2008, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Sylvain Gargasson wrote:
Thanks for my RAM problem, it's OK now, Dell share me 32GB of RAM.
But now when I try on my showroom with a lot of files in one directory I
have this error:
sho-lnx-001:~ # rsync -av
On Friday 18 January 2008, Paul Gear wrote:
Hi. I'm trying to back up from an ext3 filesystem to an IOMega Rev USB
cartridge drive, which uses a UDF filesystem. It appears to the system
as /dev/scd0, but can be mounted in R/W mode.
I get a bunch of errors like this:
rsync: mkstemp
what's the deal with configure.sh ? if i take the rsync-3.0.0pre6 tarball,
unpack it, and run `./configure make`, the make process bombs because of
configure.sh. it looks like the rsync code is trying to use configure.sh
as its output instead of the standard configure ?
-mike
signature.asc
On Saturday 01 December 2007, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Sat 01 Dec 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
what's the deal with configure.sh ? if i take the rsync-3.0.0pre6
tarball, unpack it, and run `./configure make`, the make process bombs
because of configure.sh. it looks like the rsync code
seems the behavior of rsync has changed when dealing with output and using
both -v and -q at the same time ... for example:
$ mkdir test1
$ touch test1/foo
$ rsync-2.6.0 -avq test1 test2
$ rm -r test2
$ rsync-2.6.8 -avq test1 test2
test1/
test1/fo
$ rm -r test2
$ rsync-cvs -avq test1 test2
On Saturday 13 May 2006 20:26, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 04:27:02PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
seems the behavior of rsync has changed when dealing with output and
using both -v and -q at the same time
This comes about because of the new rprintf() enums that the newer
when updating rsync in portage with the 2.6.0 release, i noticed we were still
applying the proxy auth patch ...
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03596.html
looking through this list i found that the author of the patch e-mailed here
and it was supposed to be included with 2.6.0,
14 matches
Mail list logo
