Re: LGPL relicense port of rsync

2016-01-24 Thread Per Lundqvist
et some clarity: > > - mail the other key authors listed above explaining what you're doing and > ask if they object > - mail the FSF or SFLC as custodians of the L/GPL Yes that is a very good idea. I will start by contacting FSF and see if they can clarify this. Thanks. -

Re: LGPL relicense port of rsync

2016-01-24 Thread Per Lundqvist
e is at the moment. > As for why am I not on this list? It's been a long time! I just got > interested in other things. Thanks for input! -- Per Lundqvist -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://list

Re: LGPL relicense port of rsync

2016-01-24 Thread Per Lundqvist
ckexchange.com/questions/90232/original-author-rights-in-a-licensed-software-project?rq=1 http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/86754/is-it-possible-to-rewrite-every-line-of-an-open-source-project-in-a-slightly-dif I think that the best thing would be if rsync would be split into a library part (LGPL) and application part (GPL). This could make the rsync protocol even more used. But again, it could be quite some substantial work, both coding (?) but also getting permissions from previous contributors to relicense the library part. -- Per Lundqvist -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: LGPL relicense port of rsync

2016-01-09 Thread Per Lundqvist
sync project. I guess I could write an initial protocol specification - but it would not be complete and I wouldn't be able to relicense my library to LGPL anyway. So I guess I have convinced myself that it is not worth the effort trying. Time is probably better spent coding ;) And

LGPL relicense port of rsync

2016-01-07 Thread Per Lundqvist
contributors available somewhere? thanks, -- Per Lundqvist -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

yajsync - an implementation of rsync in Java

2014-01-28 Thread Per Lundqvist
uch a great tool! If you have any questions please use the yajsync discussion group at http://groups.google.com/d/forum/yajsync thanks, Per Lundqvist -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/lis

Re: use_safe_inc_flist not set for 3.1.0 client -> 3.0.9 daemon

2013-10-28 Thread Per Lundqvist
Great, thanks! /Per Lundqvist 2013/10/28 Wayne Davison : > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Per Lundqvist wrote: >> >> n server_options() in options.c, the client does not automatically send >> 'f' anymore. > > > Yes, that appears to have been neglected i

use_safe_inc_flist not set for 3.1.0 client -> 3.0.9 daemon

2013-10-20 Thread Per Lundqvist
7,8 @@ #ifdef ICONV_OPTION argstr[x++] = 's'; #endif + if (protocol_version == 30) + argstr[x++] = 'f'; } if (x >= (int)sizeof argstr) { /* Not possible... */ thanks, /Per Lundqvist -- Please use reply-all for m