Re: Rsync "roadmap" and version numbering (3.1.0 vs 3.0.4)

2008-07-06 Thread Peter Sturdza
> > I'd like to see the create times and fileflags patches included so all > > metadata tests pass with backup bouncer 'out of the box' on Mac OS X. > > Those patches are Mac-specific, so I'm pretty sure they won't go into > the main rsync, but it would make sense to include them in packagings of

Re: rsync bandwidth usage

2008-04-23 Thread Peter Sturdza
As an example, I transfered 1930420 KBytes with rsync between two 2.8 GHz Intel P4 machines over gigabit ethernet and got this: transfer method:ssh rshnfs rsync wall time in sec 130.01 79.77 176.03 74.92 MBit/sec116 189 86201 Mind you, this is no benchmark as I

Re: rsync bandwidth usage

2008-04-23 Thread Peter Sturdza
> > How do you call rsync? > > rsync -av --delete --perms --acls ... You left out the rest. Specifically, what protocol are you using over the ethernet? Are you using an rsync server, ssh, NFS, SMB, or what? A straight rsync server is by far the fastest, I've found. So you'd do something lik

Re: symlink bug still not fixed

2004-04-22 Thread Peter Sturdza
--- Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I will consider such a change for the future, but > I'll have to spend time contemplating the > repercussions. Thanks. If you decide against changing the behavior, then please add a note in the man page (perhaps where the -u option is explained and

Re: symlink bug still not fixed

2004-04-22 Thread Peter Sturdza
--- Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > The way rsync currently works, it doesn't consider a > file and a symlink > to be the same thing, so the -u option will not > prevent a file from > being replaced by a symlink. > ... Hmm. But the symlink is older. I would expect the symlink t

symlink bug still not fixed

2004-04-22 Thread Peter Sturdza
Hi. I found and reported a bug about a year ago regarding symbolic links but haven't seen any mention of it since and it is still present in 2.6.1-pre2. Just want to make sure it isn't forgotten. It can be reproduced by synchronizing two directories, one of which contains a normal file and the o

Re: symbolic links

2002-12-04 Thread Peter Sturdza
I don't see any option that works. My problem is not how it copies the links; it is that rsync will delete a regular file and replace it with the symlink when the file is newer than the symlink. The file is always erased with no backup. This seems wrong. Basically I use rysnc to keep files on

symbolic links

2002-11-26 Thread Peter Sturdza
rsync -aub foo/ bar/ will always overwrite a file in bar with a symbolic link of the same name in foo. And there is no backup written. Is this a bug, or is there a command-line option to change this behavior? In particular, I'd like to prevent the overwriting of regular files with symbolic links