On 2023-03-09 09:10, Tomasz Chmielewski via rsync wrote:
So from the tests above, it hangs with rsync 3.2.3 on the sender and
rsync 3.2.7 on the receiver. I'll run some more tests.
Self-compiled rsync 3.2.7 on Debian to Ubuntu (rsync 3.2.7) - does NOT
hang.
Tomasz Chmielewski
--
P
On 2023-03-09 08:15, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 22:21:28 +0100 Tomasz Chmielewski via rsync wrote:
After upgrading to rsync 3.2.7, the following command hangs forever
(using "--usermap" causes the hang; without "--usermap" it doesn't
ded behaviour? The fine manual says that --usermap
should be used as a super-user on the receiver, but does not mention
that it will hang if used as a non-super-user.
Reproducible on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS.
Tomasz Chmielewski
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing
(i.e. read only access,
chroot, easy way of adding/modifying users and modules etc.)
Why was encrypted communication in rsyncd never implemented? Some
technical disagreements? Nobody volunteered?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://www.sslrack.com
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid
allowed values? 1-9? 0-9? Something else?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart
Am 29.05.2010 19:17, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski mailto:man...@wpkg.org>> wrote:
Is it possible to make rsync (in daemon mode) fetch the users from a
database (mysql, postgresql), instead of storing them in plain text
"s
Is it possible to make rsync (in daemon mode) fetch the users from a
database (mysql, postgresql), instead of storing them in plain text
"secrets file"?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe
past about such
a feature (avoiding using system cache), but I'm not sure if there were
any conclusions out of it.
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/m
Tomasz Chmielewski schrieb:
Windows systems have a great "feature" - even administrators can't
access files for which they don't have permissions (I'm not talking
about files exclusively opened, which is something else).
To read files which are normally inaccessibl
ent
permissions, Windows administrator can use Windows backup API.
Unfortunately, rsync Windows port doesn't seem to use this feature.
There was a similar thread about it 4 years ago - did anything change in
rsync from this time?
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-February/thread.html#8677
file list
is still getting built?
If it was possible, in my case, the whole data transfer could be
finished 2 hours faster.
I didn't see such option in 2.6.9; perhaps it's planned for 3.0.0?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I want to transfer files from a Windows server running rsyncd to a
local Linux machine. It has no SSH, so I can't use keys.
(...)
What is the recommended way to copy files from a (password-protected)
rsyncd server in a script?
Looks
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I want to transfer files from a Windows server running rsyncd to a local
Linux machine. It has no SSH, so I can't use keys.
(...)
What is the recommended way to copy files from a (password-protected)
rsyncd server in a script?
Looks like I should use:
e
expect <However, this has a drawback that I loose the exit code produced by
rsync (I'm no expect guru, so maybe perhaps there is a workaround to that).
What is the recommended way to copy files from a (password-protected)
rsyncd server in a script?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
--
To unsubs
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On 12/25/06, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
rsync: pop_dir "/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32/u:" (in uDrive) failed: No
such file or directory (2)
rsync error: errors selecting input/output files, dirs (code 3) at
flist.c(1281) [sen
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On 12/25/06, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wayne Davison wrote:
> [...] The uDrive module looks to have a
> bad path setting: you can't use drive letters with rsync, so be
sure to
> specify something like "/cygdrive/u"
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 02:40:47PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
2. But I don't need to copy the whole "/share/backup", all I really want
to transfer is "/share/backup/fileacl" - we change the rsync command
line accordingly:
Why did you ch
ne in the first try.
I don't see any obvious problem here.
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
depends on the
connection you have), so that there would be only one rsync instance
running?
My servers are running Debian Sarge i.e. rsync 2.6.4
Upgrade to rsync 2.6.8 on both sides?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mail
> On Mon 21 Aug 2006, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
(...)
>> Process 23311 detached
>>
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] kernel]# strace -p 23310
>> Process 23310 attached - interrupt to quit
>> select(6, [5], [], NULL, {4, 80}) = 0 (Timeout)
>> select(
essages in strace output worry me and make me think something
didn't go as planned.
I tried rsync 2.6.6, and then upgraded to 2.6.8, but both froze (at least it
looks like that to me).
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org
th support for these?
If I backup a Samba server, which has a filesystem mounted with
acl,user_xattr (with the newset version of rsync), to another server,
also with acl,user_xattr filesystem - will I loose acl and xattr attributes?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
Software deployment with Samba
http:
Philip Rhoades schrieb:
People,
My backup script has lines:
dt=`date '+%Y%m%d'`
.
.
DELETE="--delete"
.
.
rsync -av $DELETE --backup --backup-dir /delmod/$dt /etc /backup/
rsync -av $DELETE --backup --backup-dir /delmod/$dt /root /backup/
- only the changes to /root get backed up but
Stéphane Zanoni schrieb:
Hello.
I have been using rsync for a couple of months to provide synchronised
data between two of our servers and have had wonderful success with it.
I was wondering if anyone knew of another tool that might provide the
following:
- "Real-time" push synchroniza
I wrote a script that uses rsync a bit and wanted to use it. While testing
was fine, the real life was more complicated :)
Basically, my rsync command looks like that:
rsync -v -azu -b --backup-dir /var/backup/files/ /var/profiles/files/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
When I execute it where both machines
Sumit malhotra schrieb:
use samba's postexec and preexec option with RSYNC, it
should resolve the issues.
I tried that already, it's not reliable for this purpose, it seems to
work only if someone connects / disconnacts to/from a share, and not always.
--
Tomek
http://wpkg.org
WPKG - softwa
I have two offices in one city; employees work in both of them (once in
office A, the next or an hour later in office B etc.).
They would like to have the same profile (i.e., if they log off in
office A, they would like to have their documents, Desktop, emails etc.
in the profile in the office
Antony Lesuisse schrieb:
This is a late reply to a thread of Tomasz Chmielewsk
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-October/013878.html
He asked if some workaround existed for rename of big files.
I've made a script (python needed on both sides) that links the guessed
files in the right d
Eberhard Moenkeberg schrieb:
(...)
Basically, this is how rsync works, but in the end, we transfer 1 GB
of files over WAN that we already have locally - the only thing that
changed was the folder where that data is.
Is there some workaround for this (some intelligent script etc.)?
I guess
I use rsync for backing up user data, profiles, important network shares
etc. (from several locations over WAN).
Overall it works flawlessly, as it transfers only changes, but sometimes
there are some serious hiccups.
Suppose this scenario, suppose it's 1 GB of files:
user shares:
/home/joe
Wayne Davison schrieb:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:05:47PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I'm trying to copy recursively only /etc, /home/samba/profiles and
/home/samba/shared.
The manpage explains how you need to include all directories on the way
down to the file/dir in the recu
I'm trying to copy recursively only /etc, /home/samba/profiles and
/home/samba/shared.
To do so, I use this rsync command:
rsync --progress -v -u -a -z --stats \
--include="/etc" \
--include="/home/samba/profiles" \
--include="/home/samba/shared" \
--exclude="/*" \
--numeric-ids --delete-after
Craig Barratt schrieb:
Tomasz Chmielewski writes:
I noticed that rsync can preserve most of the file's characteristics
when it is used with "-a" option (it includes -o and -g flags for
preserving owners and groups).
However, when I transfer data between systems, it affec
I noticed that rsync can preserve most of the file's characteristics
when it is used with "-a" option (it includes -o and -g flags for
preserving owners and groups).
However, when I transfer data between systems, it affects my UIDs/GIDs,
making the data hard to recover.
Example:
Sending sid
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I want to be 100% sure that rsync copies something from one location to
another.
However, I did not see an option which would make rsync retry an operation if
it failed for whatever reason (network was down when rsync
Hello,
I want to be 100% sure that rsync copies something from one location to
another.
However, I did not see an option which would make rsync retry an
operation if it failed for whatever reason (network was down when rsync
started, or network went down during rsync was copying something,
con
36 matches
Mail list logo