[Bug 11507] Minimize writes when syncing local files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507 Erik Tews changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug 11507] Minimize writes when syncing local files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507 --- Comment #2 from Erik Tews --- Thanks, I didn't find that option so far, but I assume it does exactly what I am looking for. You may close that report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use

[Bug 11507] New: Minimize writes when syncing local files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507 Bug ID: 11507 Summary: Minimize writes when syncing local files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

[Bug 11507] Minimize writes when syncing local files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb --- --no-whole-file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https:

[Bug 11506] New: bug 6542 resurfaces: hlink.c:126: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11506 Bug ID: 11506 Summary: bug 6542 resurfaces: hlink.c:126: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed. Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64

[Bug 11496] itemized logging of transferred bytes is cumulative instead of per file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11496 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 11496] New: itemized logging of transferred bytes is cumulative instead of per file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11496 Bug ID: 11496 Summary: itemized logging of transferred bytes is cumulative instead of per file Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux

[Bug 11489] New: --update --size-only ignored when syncing / dump copies everything

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11489 Bug ID: 11489 Summary: --update --size-only ignored when syncing / dump copies everything Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64 OS: All Stat

[Bug 11484] Add --xattrs support for NetBSD

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11484 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 11484] New: Add --xattrs support for NetBSD

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11484 Bug ID: 11484 Summary: Add --xattrs support for NetBSD Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: NetBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug 11481] --ignore-errors must be a separate option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11481 --- Comment #2 from Muralidhar N --- Yes. we must have --ignore-errors independent of --delete and also --force independent of --delete. sometimes we may not use --delete at all and want to continue with rsync even when errors are there and also so

[Bug 11481] --ignore-errors must be a separate option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11481 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Korb --- Rsync does continue on errors unless those errors are fatal (like a failure to connect). Sounds more like what you want is a retry option which is easy enough to script. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 11481] --ignore-errors must be a separate option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11481 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb --- --force exists to force --delete to work even when there are errors. That is the only behaviour that rsync changes based on errors. So what would you expect --ignore-errors to change when there is no --delete?

[Bug 11481] New: --ignore-errors must be a separate option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11481 Bug ID: 11481 Summary: --ignore-errors must be a separate option Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 11474] New: Retry delay for lost connection

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11474 Bug ID: 11474 Summary: Retry delay for lost connection Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Prior

[Bug 10724] rsync 3.1.1 creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 --- Comment #12 from chd...@gmail.com --- I can confirm that on rsync 3.1.2pre, the reproduction example I gave at the start of this thread no longer replicates the issue. That is, 3.1.2pre appears at first blush to have fixed the problem. Thanks!

[Bug 11456] Allow configuration of MAX_GID_LIST

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11456 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 11423] rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED --- Comment #12 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 11423] rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 --- Comment #11 from Philip Rhoades --- How is this resolved? The change in behaviour is a major PITA . . Phil. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omit

[Bug 11215] compression/zlib errors discard the zlib error message

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 --- Comment #1 from Shevek --- I think this bug is affecting us too, over multi-gigabyte files. There's one specific file which is killing rsync, but it doesn't always kill it in the same place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 11456] New: Allow configuration of MAX_GID_LIST

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11456 Bug ID: 11456 Summary: Allow configuration of MAX_GID_LIST Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement P

[Bug 11423] rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 --- Comment #10 from adsh --- There is example how to remove all garbage backup-dirs in FreBSD without pipes in one line: find /var/backups/www/old/ -type d -maxdepth 1 -empty -delete but all this solutions are dirty hacks, not well-established r

[Bug 11423] rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Korb --- While it is true that 'rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty "$BACKUP_DIR"' is GNU (not Linux) specific it is also true that 'rmdir "$BACKUP_DIR" > /dev/null 2>&1' is POSIX specific. If you want even more compatibilit

[Bug 11423] rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 --- Comment #8 from adsh --- You simply may add program code to remove empty backup-dir after sync is done for compatibility with older versions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-al

[Bug 11423] rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 --- Comment #7 from adsh --- adsh@gw:~>mkdir test adsh@gw:~>rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty test/ rmdir: illegal option -- - usage: rmdir [-pv] directory ... adsh@gw:~>uname -sr FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p21 adsh@Launcher:~>mkdir test adsh@Launcher:~>r

[Bug 6590] [sender] could not find xattr #1 for home/jdoe/TheFresh

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6590 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Kristian --- I am running into this on rsync v3.1.1 in Debian Jessie. The symptoms are the same as #3, and as 3.1.1 have the patch in https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9594 as I have understood I think this is anot

[Bug 11423] rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 10724] rsync 3.1.1 creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 --- Comment #11 from Wayne Davison --- Yes, the top-level backup dir is created at the start of the transfer. I don't plan to change that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for

[Bug 10724] rsync 3.1.1 creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 --- Comment #10 from adsh --- Sorry - read this link: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the ma

[Bug 10724] rsync 3.1.1 creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 --- Comment #9 from adsh --- Please read https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 carefully. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mail

[Bug 10724] rsync 3.1.1 creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 --- Comment #8 from adsh --- Bug is NOT fixed: rsync --version (on host and client machines) rsync version 3.1.2pre1 protocol version 31 ... rsync -btrhv -e "ssh -i /root/.ssh/id_ecdsa_rsync_server" --delete-after \ --backup-dir=/var/backups/se

[Bug 10724] rsync 3.1.1 creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 10724] rsync 3.1.1 creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 11423] rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 10724] rsync 3.1.1 creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@univ.kiev.ua --- Comment #5 from Wayn

[Bug 11423] rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 --- Comment #4 from roland --- if rsync befor 3.1.0 created backup dir only when needed, i think the behaviour should be changed to the old one - it sounds reasonable what you tell. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact f

[Bug 11423] rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 --- Comment #3 from a...@univ.kiev.ua --- With construction like: --backup-dir=/var/backups/www/old/`date +%F` I see backup dirs with changed files only. Rsync 3.1.x break this backup feature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 11423] rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 --- Comment #2 from a...@univ.kiev.ua --- It's request from not me only: http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/150378/rsync-3-1-0-is-creating-empty-backup-directories?rq=1 I search for solution to fix it like other peoples... -- You are receiv

[Bug 11423] rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb --- Just a fellow user here but... Isn't it worth it to you to spend 4KB of disk space and 1 inode to record that a backup happened and that no files were replaced or deleted during that backup? -- You are receivin

[Bug 11423] New: rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423 Bug ID: 11423 Summary: rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major

[Bug 11422] Feature request: add support for Linux libcap[-ng]

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11422 Kevin Korb changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug 11422] New: Feature request: add support for Linux libcap[-ng]

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11422 Bug ID: 11422 Summary: Feature request: add support for Linux libcap[-ng] Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 11414] rsync: chgrp "/.filename.5afK5X" (in dirdir) failed: Operation not permitted (1)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11414 Nguyen Si Nhan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 11414] New: rsync: chgrp "/.filename.5afK5X" (in dirdir) failed: Operation not permitted (1)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11414 Bug ID: 11414 Summary: rsync: chgrp "/.filename.5afK5X" (in dirdir) failed: Operation not permitted (1) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux

[Bug 11378] Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Nathan Neulinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 3099] Please parallelize filesystem scan

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099 --- Comment #8 from Chip Schweiss --- I would argue that optionally all directory scanning should be made parallel. Modern file systems perform best when request queues are kept full. The current mode of rsync scanning directories does nothing to

[Bug 3099] Please parallelize filesystem scan

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099 --- Comment #7 from Rainer --- Hi, I'm experiencing the very same problem: I'm trying to sync a set of VMWare disk files (about 2.5TB) with not too many changes, and direct copying is still faster than the checksumming by a quite large margin becau

[Bug 10448] Finish implementing the --ignore-case feature

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448 --- Comment #3 from John Pierman --- Because you're not running it on a case-ignoring filesystem. That patch is (sadly) only a partially effective set of changes that helps rsync to deal with a filesystem that doesn't differentiate upper-/lower-ca

[Bug 10448] Finish implementing the --ignore-case feature

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448 --- Comment #2 from John Pierman --- tested with 3.07 and 3.1 with --ignore-case patch applied cd /tmp mkdir -p a/b/c/d/e/f mkdir -p A/b/C/D/e/F add some files to a/b/c/d/e/f/ rsync -r --ignore-case a/ A/ >> creates b/c/d/e/f/ Why is it not ignor

[Bug 11035] make check failure

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11035 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan S. Abrams --- When will v3.1.2, or some other version with this fix, be released to the public? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to

[Bug 10995] rsync -aFF crashes when parent directory of source directory has a .rsync-filter file with a dir-merge rule in it

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10995 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 10677] external zlib broken after update to 3.1.1 on FreeBSD

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10677 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 11086] rsync --delete has stopped to delete destination files that don't exist at the source

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11086 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug 11035] make check failure

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11035 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 10776] SIGSEGV in utf8_internal_loop()

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10776 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 10494] remove-source-files fails with symlinks

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10494 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 9562] Systemd socket activation

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9562 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 8885] Certain directory name results in a strange file being created

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8885 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 8847] detect-renamed.diff update to ensure existence of directory for partial-dir

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 10977] Rsync path spoofing attack vulnerability (rsync 3.1.1 tested)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10977 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 11369] obsoleted autoconf macros

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11369 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 11378] Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Neulinger --- Unfortunately, that just moves the buffering issue to tr instead of rsync. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omi

[Bug 11385] New: calls to functions like close are not wrapped to try again in cases of intermittent interruptions

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11385 Bug ID: 11385 Summary: calls to functions like close are not wrapped to try again in cases of intermittent interruptions Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All

[Bug 11378] Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 --- Comment #3 from Karl O. Pinc --- On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 17:56:25 + samba-b...@samba.org wrote: > --- Comment #2 from Nathan Neulinger --- > Perhaps the naming is not correct on my suggested option (and I'll > admit, I completely missed the o

[Bug 11378] Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Nathan Neulinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME

[Bug 11378] Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 11383] New: rsync_panic_handler may execute incomplete command

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11383 Bug ID: 11383 Summary: rsync_panic_handler may execute incomplete command Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 11382] New: elapsed time calculation does not account for time function possibly returning -1

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 Bug ID: 11382 Summary: elapsed time calculation does not account for time function possibly returning -1 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All

[Bug 11369] obsoleted autoconf macros

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11369 --- Comment #1 from Brant Gurganus --- Created attachment 11232 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=11232&action=edit patch consisting of autoupdate changes that do not involve evaluating code compatibility impact I've created a pat

[Bug 11378] New: Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Bug ID: 11378 Summary: Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc. Product: rsync Version:

[Bug 6307] "rsync --remove-source-files foo/ foo/" should not delete files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6307 --- Comment #2 from tombosho...@gmail.com --- Same for me. No data loss here, but a bunch of work undeleting the files and moving them back to the right directories. Files should only be removed if they are actually copied to another location. --

[Bug 11369] New: obsoleted autoconf macros

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11369 Bug ID: 11369 Summary: obsoleted autoconf macros Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5

[Bug 4017] rsync 2.6.8: "unexpected tag 3 [sender]"

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #11193||review- Flags|

[Bug 4017] rsync 2.6.8: "unexpected tag 3 [sender]"

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017 --- Comment #2 from Alice --- Created attachment 11193 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=11193&action=edit patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies

[Bug 11338] Rsync Crash - Segmentation fault

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11338 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 11338] New: Rsync Crash - Segmentation fault

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11338 Bug ID: 11338 Summary: Rsync Crash - Segmentation fault Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug 9560] drop-cache option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9560 --- Comment #6 from Michele Dionisio --- Hi, I'm testing the patch on 3.1.1 on an embedded device with swapless linux. The patch works perfect on my application but to avoid to apply the patch also on the remote side (where I have no control) I hav

[Bug 9560] drop-cache option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9560 --- Comment #5 from Michele Dionisio --- Created attachment 11169 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=11169&action=edit fadvice without effect on remote -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. --

[Bug 11322] some tests use invalid command (fail)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11322 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 11322] some tests use invalid command (fail)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11322 --- Comment #1 from alexanderlaw --- Created attachment 11136 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=11136&action=edit Replace fail command with a valid one -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -

[Bug 11322] New: some tests use invalid command (fail)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11322 Bug ID: 11322 Summary: some tests use invalid command (fail) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Prio

[Bug 10338] Start deletion from the top of the hierarchy

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10338 --- Comment #3 from Ben RUBSON --- Hello, Any news regarding this enhancement request ? Thank you very much ! Ben -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid om

[Bug 11264] rsync protocol data stream

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 11264] rsync protocol data stream

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 --- Comment #1 from Paul Slootman --- You don't show what command line you're using. The clue is probably in the message "requested action not supported", you're talking to a pretty ancient version of rsync which probably doesn't support some of th

[Bug 11264] New: rsync protocol data stream

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Bug ID: 11264 Summary: rsync protocol data stream Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 11253] --exclude=dir doesn't work with --files-from=

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11253 --- Comment #2 from Vegard Nossum --- (In reply to Wayne Davison from comment #1) Thank you for the explanation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitt

[Bug 11253] --exclude=dir doesn't work with --files-from=

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11253 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug 11253] New: --exclude=dir doesn't work with --files-from=

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11253 Bug ID: 11253 Summary: --exclude=dir doesn't work with --files-from= Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 4621] Option to create ancestors of destination, like "mkdir -p"

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4621 --- Comment #8 from Dan Jacobson --- Yes please implement this cpio --make-directories functionality ! http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18491548/rsync-create-all-missing-parent-directories http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1636889/rsync-how-can

[Bug 11229] off-by-one in snprintf() check

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11229 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 11229] New: off-by-one in snprintf() check

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11229 Bug ID: 11229 Summary: off-by-one in snprintf() check Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug 11215] New: compression/zlib errors discard the zlib error message

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Bug ID: 11215 Summary: compression/zlib errors discard the zlib error message Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: norm

[Bug 11151] rsync transfers entire source file even when unable to create destination

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11151 --- Comment #1 from Brian Candler --- Possibly related to #10675 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change op

[Bug 11189] dry run gives incomplete log

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11189 Jerome changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug 11189] dry run gives incomplete log

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11189 --- Comment #2 from Jerome --- Ok, so to check the impact of --delete, one has to use --verbose and --dry-run, and look at stdout -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replie

[Bug 11189] dry run gives incomplete log

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11189 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb --- I believe the bug here is that it logged any changes during the dry run. The logfile is supposed to be a log of what it actually did not what it would do. The log-file setting was really made for rsyncd and ther

[Bug 11189] New: dry run gives incomplete log

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11189 Bug ID: 11189 Summary: dry run gives incomplete log Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug 10170] rsync should support reflink similar to cp --reflink

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10170 --- Comment #5 from kdave --- (In reply to David Taylor from comment #2) A few things: * thanks for working on reflink support in rsync :) * btrfs is not the only filesystem to support reflink, ocfs2 does as well, so you might make the formulati

[Bug 11166] running with -vvv causes a hang

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11166 --- Comment #1 from pjump --- Basically it just freezes. No IO, no CPU usage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe

[Bug 11166] New: running with -vvv causes a hang

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11166 Bug ID: 11166 Summary: running with -vvv causes a hang Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >