https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11481
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb ---
--force exists to force --delete to work even when there are errors. That is
the only behaviour that rsync changes based on errors. So what would you
expect --ignore-errors to change when
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11481
Bug ID: 11481
Summary: --ignore-errors must be a separate option
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11474
Bug ID: 11474
Summary: Retry delay for lost connection
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #12 from chd...@gmail.com ---
I can confirm that on rsync 3.1.2pre, the reproduction example I gave at the
start of this thread no longer replicates the issue. That is, 3.1.2pre appears
at first blush to have fixed the problem.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11456
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
--- Comment #11 from Philip Rhoades p...@pricom.com.au ---
How is this resolved? The change in behaviour is a major PITA . .
Phil.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #12
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215
--- Comment #1 from Shevek bugzi...@anarres.org ---
I think this bug is affecting us too, over multi-gigabyte files. There's one
specific file which is killing rsync, but it doesn't always kill it in the same
place.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11456
Bug ID: 11456
Summary: Allow configuration of MAX_GID_LIST
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
--- Comment #7 from adsh a...@univ.kiev.ua ---
adsh@gw:~mkdir test
adsh@gw:~rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty test/
rmdir: illegal option -- -
usage: rmdir [-pv] directory ...
adsh@gw:~uname -sr
FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p21
adsh@Launcher:~mkdir test
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
--- Comment #8 from adsh a...@univ.kiev.ua ---
You simply may add program code to remove empty backup-dir after sync is done
for compatibility with older versions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
--- Comment #9 from Kevin Korb rs...@sanitarium.net ---
While it is true that 'rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty $BACKUP_DIR' is GNU
(not Linux) specific it is also true that 'rmdir $BACKUP_DIR /dev/null
21' is POSIX specific. If you want even
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
--- Comment #10 from adsh a...@univ.kiev.ua ---
There is example how to remove all garbage backup-dirs in FreBSD without pipes
in one line:
find /var/backups/www/old/ -type d -maxdepth 1 -empty -delete
but all this solutions are dirty hacks, not
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6590
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Kristian hkba...@gmail.com ---
I am running into this on rsync v3.1.1 in Debian Jessie.
The symptoms are the same as #3, and as 3.1.1 have the patch in
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9594 as I have understood I
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #11 from Wayne Davison way...@samba.org ---
Yes, the top-level backup dir is created at the start of the transfer. I don't
plan to change that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |WONTFIX
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #9 from adsh a...@univ.kiev.ua ---
Please read https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 carefully.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #8 from adsh a...@univ.kiev.ua ---
Bug is NOT fixed:
rsync --version (on host and client machines)
rsync version 3.1.2pre1 protocol version 31
...
rsync -btrhv -e ssh -i /root/.ssh/id_ecdsa_rsync_server --delete-after \
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #10 from adsh a...@univ.kiev.ua ---
Sorry - read this link: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@univ.kiev.ua
---
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
--- Comment #4 from roland devz...@web.de ---
if rsync befor 3.1.0 created backup dir only when needed, i think the behaviour
should be changed to the old one - it sounds reasonable what you tell.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11422
Bug ID: 11422
Summary: Feature request: add support for Linux libcap[-ng]
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11422
Kevin Korb rs...@sanitarium.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
Bug ID: 11423
Summary: rsync 3.1.x is creating empty backup directories
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb rs...@sanitarium.net ---
Just a fellow user here but...
Isn't it worth it to you to spend 4KB of disk space and 1 inode to record that
a backup happened and that no files were replaced or deleted during that
backup?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
--- Comment #2 from a...@univ.kiev.ua ---
It's request from not me only:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/150378/rsync-3-1-0-is-creating-empty-backup-directories?rq=1
I search for solution to fix it like other peoples...
--
You are
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11423
--- Comment #3 from a...@univ.kiev.ua ---
With construction like:
--backup-dir=/var/backups/www/old/`date +%F`
I see backup dirs with changed files only.
Rsync 3.1.x break this backup feature.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11414
Nguyen Si Nhan nhanngu...@0937686468.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11414
Bug ID: 11414
Summary: rsync: chgrp /.filename.5afK5X (in dirdir) failed:
Operation not permitted (1)
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: x64
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099
--- Comment #8 from Chip Schweiss c...@innovates.com ---
I would argue that optionally all directory scanning should be made parallel.
Modern file systems perform best when request queues are kept full. The
current mode of rsync scanning
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099
--- Comment #7 from Rainer rai...@voigt-home.net ---
Hi,
I'm experiencing the very same problem: I'm trying to sync a set of VMWare disk
files (about 2.5TB) with not too many changes, and direct copying is still
faster than the checksumming by a
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448
--- Comment #2 from John Pierman haqt...@gmail.com ---
tested with 3.07 and 3.1 with --ignore-case patch applied
cd /tmp
mkdir -p a/b/c/d/e/f
mkdir -p A/b/C/D/e/F
add some files to a/b/c/d/e/f/
rsync -r --ignore-case a/ A/
creates b/c/d/e/f/files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448
--- Comment #3 from John Pierman haqt...@gmail.com ---
Because you're not running it on a case-ignoring filesystem. That patch is
(sadly) only a partially effective set of changes that helps rsync to deal with
a filesystem that doesn't
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10995
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11035
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan S. Abrams jonathansabr...@gmail.com ---
When will v3.1.2, or some other version with this fix, be released to the
public?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9562
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8885
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10776
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11035
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10494
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11086
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10677
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10977
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11369
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Neulinger nn...@neulinger.org ---
Unfortunately, that just moves the buffering issue to tr instead of rsync.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11385
Bug ID: 11385
Summary: calls to functions like close are not wrapped to try
again in cases of intermittent interruptions
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11383
Bug ID: 11383
Summary: rsync_panic_handler may execute incomplete command
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378
Nathan Neulinger nn...@neulinger.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378
--- Comment #3 from Karl O. Pinc k...@meme.com ---
On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 17:56:25 +
samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Neulinger nn...@neulinger.org ---
Perhaps the naming is not correct on my suggested option (and I'll
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382
Bug ID: 11382
Summary: elapsed time calculation does not account for time
function possibly returning -1
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11369
--- Comment #1 from Brant Gurganus br...@gurganus.name ---
Created attachment 11232
-- https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=11232action=edit
patch consisting of autoupdate changes that do not involve evaluating code
compatibility impact
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378
Bug ID: 11378
Summary: Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make
logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI
systems/etc.
Product: rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6307
--- Comment #2 from tombosho...@gmail.com tombosho...@gmail.com ---
Same for me. No data loss here, but a bunch of work undeleting the files and
moving them back to the right directories.
Files should only be removed if they are actually copied to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11338
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017
--- Comment #2 from Alice storm.e1...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 11193
-- https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=11193action=edit
patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #11193||review-
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11338
Bug ID: 11338
Summary: Rsync Crash - Segmentation fault
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: x64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9560
--- Comment #6 from Michele Dionisio michele.dioni...@gmail.com ---
Hi, I'm testing the patch on 3.1.1 on an embedded device with swapless linux.
The patch works perfect on my application but to avoid to apply the patch also
on the remote side
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9560
--- Comment #5 from Michele Dionisio michele.dioni...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 11169
-- https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=11169action=edit
fadvice without effect on remote
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11322
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11322
--- Comment #1 from alexanderlaw a.la...@ntcit-rosa.ru ---
Created attachment 11136
-- https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=11136action=edit
Replace fail command with a valid one
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11322
Bug ID: 11322
Summary: some tests use invalid command (fail)
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10338
--- Comment #3 from Ben RUBSON ben.rub...@gmail.com ---
Hello,
Any news regarding this enhancement request ?
Thank you very much !
Ben
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
Bug ID: 11264
Summary: rsync protocol data stream
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
--- Comment #1 from Paul Slootman p...@debian.org ---
You don't show what command line you're using. The clue is probably in the
message requested action not supported, you're talking to a pretty ancient
version of rsync which probably doesn't
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11253
Bug ID: 11253
Summary: --exclude=dir doesn't work with --files-from=
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11253
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11253
--- Comment #2 from Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Wayne Davison from comment #1)
Thank you for the explanation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4621
--- Comment #8 from Dan Jacobson jida...@jidanni.org ---
Yes please implement this cpio --make-directories functionality !
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18491548/rsync-create-all-missing-parent-directories
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11229
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11229
Bug ID: 11229
Summary: off-by-one in snprintf() check
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215
Bug ID: 11215
Summary: compression/zlib errors discard the zlib error message
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11151
--- Comment #1 from Brian Candler b.cand...@pobox.com ---
Possibly related to #10675
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11189
--- Comment #2 from Jerome riq...@petitbonum.be ---
Ok, so to check the impact of --delete, one has to use --verbose and --dry-run,
and look at stdout
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11189
Jerome riq...@petitbonum.be changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11189
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb rs...@sanitarium.net ---
I believe the bug here is that it logged any changes during the dry run. The
logfile is supposed to be a log of what it actually did not what it would do.
The log-file setting was really
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11189
Bug ID: 11189
Summary: dry run gives incomplete log
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Hardware: x64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10170
--- Comment #5 from kdave d...@jikos.cz ---
(In reply to David Taylor from comment #2)
A few things:
* thanks for working on reflink support in rsync :)
* btrfs is not the only filesystem to support reflink, ocfs2 does as well, so
you might make
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11166
Bug ID: 11166
Summary: running with -vvv causes a hang
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11166
--- Comment #1 from pjump psko...@gmail.com ---
Basically it just freezes. No IO, no CPU usage.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11152
--- Comment #1 from Andre Bruce andrebr...@gmail.com ---
I believe that I can get our company to make a donation/contribution, using
paypal, to have this feature (or, if you prefer, we may contribute with server
hardware which is not in use
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11161
Bug ID: 11161
Summary: rare crash in hlink.c:536
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: x64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11151
Bug ID: 11151
Summary: rsync transfers entire source file even when unable to
create destination
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11152
Bug ID: 11152
Summary: Feature Request: Cache Filelist
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4615
--- Comment #2 from Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz ---
What you're asking for is currently possible with an external utility, called
rsyncrypto (http://rsyncrypto.lingnu.com). It, in fact, does not require you to
trust the server you're storing
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4615
Matthias m...@matthiasbock.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@matthiasbock.net
---
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
--- Comment #6 from don...@gmx.com ---
+1 from here as well.
I understand the arguments about the limited usefulness of the atime field in
general, and I agree with much of it, but to me there are more use cases than
what's mentioned in what I've
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1
Bug ID: 1
Summary: Describe the interaction between --one-file-system and
--delete-excluded
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #1 from Bill McGonigle bill+sa...@bfccomputing.com ---
argh - messed up the reduced example. Should be host:/
rsync --one-file-system --delete-excluded --exclude=/bar/ host:/ /foo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #1 from Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us ---
this is
https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=blob;f=write-devices.diff
using it in production now
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
Bug ID: 11101
Summary: support writing to devices
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10081
--- Comment #2 from devuran...@gmx.net ---
I assume this is not being considered, because the backup needs to be restored
in case the new file is corrupted? So overwriting it would be bad?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11075
--- Comment #1 from Robin Powell rlpow...@digitalkingdom.org ---
Apparently it's not just --inplace??
rlpowell@flowcytech01 rsync -aPv
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11086
Bug ID: 11086
Summary: rsync --delete has stopped to delete destination files
that don't exist at the source
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: x64
OS:
301 - 400 of 3934 matches
Mail list logo