Hi Friends,
I am using rsync to copy data from Production File Server to Disaster Recovery
file server. I have 100Mbps link setup between these two servers. Folder
structure is very deep. It is having path like
/reports/folder1/date/folder2/file.tx, where we have 1600 directories like
, --inplace might help performance but be sure to read
about it.
On 04/12/12 14:29, vijay patel wrote:
Hi Friends,
I am using rsync to copy data from Production File Server to
Disaster Recovery file server. I have 100Mbps link setup between
these two servers. Folder structure is very deep
to the copying.
On 04/12/12 16:59, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/12/2012 03:28:18 PM, vijay patel wrote:
Thanks friends. We are using Redhat Linux 5.8 on Production and
Disaster Recovery side. By drilling down we have found out it
is taking lot of time to check what has changed while data
tranfer
. It would make no difference in the indexing.
Have you checked your version yet? Run rsync --version on both
systems. If it isn't 3.0.something upgrade. That will make a big
difference.
On 04/12/12 17:16, vijay patel wrote:
I am getting following thing in 'tune2fs -l' :
Filesystem
before kernel 3.0, pathname lookups got
noticeably faster.
You could also try an alternative filesystem like xfs. It's
supposed to be pretty good at large directories.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:29 AM, vijay patel
catchv...@hotmail.com mailto:catchv...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi
