> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:43:20 -0800
> From: Wayne Davison
A couple questions below; please bear with me.
> No, if you do a ext4 -> ext4 copy, rsync has set the matching ns info for
> transferred files since 3.1.0. There was a case prior to rsync 3.1.2 where
> a brand-new
[Included text copied from the commit.]
> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:52:49 +
> From: samba-b...@samba.org
> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521
> Wayne Davison changed:
>What|Removed |
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Gursky ---
(In reply to Michael McCracken from comment #1)
I believe the rsync maintainer might have commented this with at least the
reference to the mailing list [1], where this has been already proposed, though
ignore
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521
--- Comment #1 from Michael McCracken ---
Created attachment 11440
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=11440&action=edit
patch to check hi-res timestamp in unchanged_file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Conta
