https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12915
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
Rsync should not be responsible for detecting what a filesystem can handle.
That makes the most sense to me. There are countless filesystems, each
with their own quirks, and countless mkfs and mount options which just
multiplies the possible fs behaviors even more. Best to provide controls
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12915
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Korb ---
The 3602 problem happens when the clocks change not the entire time the clocks
are different. If you do a daily rsync then rsync will see 1 hour off
timestamps the day after both clock
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12915
--- Comment #7 from Ian Kelling ---
> But here in the US for half of the year you need --modify-window=3602 instead.
I think people use vfat because there are a lot of devices out there
like android which require it, and they only
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12915
--- Comment #6 from Ben RUBSON ---
Just to clarify, is FAT32 also impacted and requires --modify-window option, or
only the old one FAT is ? Thx !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12915
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Korb ---
Actually, I looked it up. It wasn't actually my request I had already dealt
with the problem.
This is the ticket from the person I was helping:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12915
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Korb ---
The manual says that with FAT you need --modify-window=2 not 1. But here in
the US for half of the year you need --modify-window=3602 instead. The same
goes for many other locations. The
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12915
--- Comment #3 from Brian K. White ---
(In reply to Ian Kelling from comment #2)
The manuals says useful not helpful. The manual does not say it's good or bad
or recommended or any other value judgement. It only describes it's
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12915
--- Comment #2 from Ian Kelling ---
> This would not actually be very helpful.
Why? You haven't said. The manual says it's helpful
and it's helpful for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12915
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb ---
This would not actually be very helpful. Going between a *nix style timestamp
and a FAT one has other issues. Especially if your TZ changes or you are in a
TZ where the clock changes twice
10 matches
Mail list logo