https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Bartlett ---
Samba 4.11 moved to GnuTLS for our MD5 and other hash operations, and so uses
any hardware optimisation available there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Pleas
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082
--- Comment #5 from Ben RUBSON ---
Really nice additions, it looks promising, thank you very much Jorrit & Wayne !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082
--- Comment #3 from Ben RUBSON ---
Yes, and as discussed there also, sounds like xxhash could be a better solution
than SSE / hardware backed MD5.
Feel free to close this then if not so relevant.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082
--- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison ---
No, that patch has nothing to do with MD5. It is optimizing the rolling
checksum.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082
--- Comment #1 from Ben RUBSON ---
First info / first patch there :
https://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2020-May/032175.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies t