[Bug 3444] Deal with case-insensitive file-systems better (perhaps by adding an option)

2016-12-02 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3444 Dmitry changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dm...@mail.ru --- Comment #12 from Dmitry --- I b

[Bug 3444] Deal with case-insensitive file-systems better (perhaps by adding an option)

2012-04-28 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3444 --- Comment #11 from Brendan Byrd 2012-04-28 16:27:00 UTC --- What the FUCK guys?! This thing was reported 6 years ago, and somebody provided a patch (which was written back in 2003), but then you sit on it for 9 years??! That's certainly a nice

[Bug 3444] Deal with case-insensitive file-systems better (perhaps by adding an option)

2011-06-06 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3444 Jamie Zawinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@jwz.org --- Comment #10 from Jamie Za

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3444] Deal with case-insensitive file-systems better (perhaps by adding an option)

2007-09-04 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3444 --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-04 17:36 CST --- looks like a patch is already there PLEASE consider this in the next build! this will help both windows <-> windows and linux <-> windows! http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/unpack

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3444] Deal with case-insensitive file-systems better (perhaps by adding an option)

2007-06-22 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3444 --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-22 13:35 CST --- That's some compatibility code outside of rsync, since rsync doesn't change the case of names. Back in the old days, a filesystem could only hold upper-case letters. When m

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3444] Deal with case-insensitive file-systems better (perhaps by adding an option)

2007-06-22 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3444 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-22 06:50 CST --- (In reply to comment #6) Note - after further looking at this I found that rsync is creating temp transfer files (at Linux end) with correct case but after the file is receiv

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3444] Deal with case-insensitive file-systems better (perhaps by adding an option)

2007-06-22 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3444 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-22 06:40 CST --- I have been experiencing strange behaviour in a situation like this. I'm not sure if this is supposed to occur but it doesn't seem like it should. In my case I am using rsync

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3444] Deal with case-insensitive file-systems better (perhaps by adding an option)

2006-02-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3444 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 02:46 MST --- --ignore-case solves the critical problem of unwanted file deletions. There still is a (less critical) problem when one want to change the case of a file name. Even on case

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3444] Deal with case-insensitive file-systems better (perhaps by adding an option)

2006-01-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3444 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-31 10:34 MST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Do you mean that the ignore-case.diff patch that is found in the patches > directory of the 2.6.6 source distribution does not work ? That's right

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3444] Deal with case-insensitive file-systems better (perhaps by adding an option)

2006-01-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3444 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-31 08:16 MST --- > Note that the patch that came > with 2.6.6 builds, but is ineffective. The version in CVS should be OK. Do you mean that the ignore-case.diff patch that is found in the pa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3444] Deal with case-insensitive file-systems better (perhaps by adding an option)

2006-01-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3444 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|enhancement Status|NEW