https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
--- Comment #17 from Wayne Davison ---
I just tweaked the option name to --open-noatime, which I think is clearer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
--- Comment #15 from Michal Ruprich ---
Thanks Samuel,
now I can enable tests during build in Fedora and keep the noatime option as
well. Still though, it would be good to have upstream approval on this :/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
Samuel Henrique changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15524|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
--- Comment #13 from Samuel Henrique ---
Created attachment 15524
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=15524=edit
Adds --noatime option for 3.1.3
Updated the patch to fix "make test" with the help of
Paul Slootman.
I'm happy to say
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
--- Comment #12 from Samuel Henrique ---
The patch is currently introducing a regression on the target "test" (make
test).
/usr/bin/ld: syscall.o: in function `do_open':
./syscall.c:206: undefined reference to `noatime'
It happens when the target
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
--- Comment #11 from Samuel Henrique ---
This patch has been being applied to the Debian packaging of rsync since 2014
(5 years now).
As Michal Ruprich said, this patch requires the build to be made in a certain
way as it can lead to undefined
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
--- Comment #10 from Michal Ruprich ---
Hi,
I think that ideally you should decide what to do with this. This almost 10
years old bug is still here and it seems no one from the rsync developers paid
any attention to this. If you are not planning
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
--- Comment #9 from Michal Ruprich ---
Did any of you who uses rsync with noatime patch had problems with running
'make check' command? It seems to me that some of the source files might be
compiling in different order than
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
--- Comment #8 from Michal Ruprich ---
Is there any update on this feature? Is there a plan to merge the patch into
master branch of rsync?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
--- Comment #7 from cyril...@gmail.com ---
+1
I'm currently using a locally patched version, because I'm using rsync to
mirror my whole data daily, plus using a deduplicating backup tool weekly that
stores atime (so if rsync sets atime, the metadata
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
--- Comment #6 from don...@gmx.com ---
+1 from here as well.
I understand the arguments about the limited usefulness of the atime field in
general, and I agree with much of it, but to me there are more use cases than
what's mentioned in what I've
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
Martin von Gagern martin.vgag...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9278||review?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
Martin von Gagern martin.vgag...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
devz...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||devz...@web.de
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
--- Comment #3 from nicolas.geo...@normalesup.org 2010-08-22 07:49 CST
---
They have a similar purpose, but they do not work the same way at all.
My patch (comment #2) politely asks the kernel not to update the atime of
opened files.
16 matches
Mail list logo