On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:24:02PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
Long term this would give us the ability to log at the right point,
after it is actually been completed but done on the local end. Right
now a push logs the completion when the sender has finished with the
file even if the last bit
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 09:02:27AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:24:02PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
Long term this would give us the ability to log at the right point,
after it is actually been completed but done on the local end. Right
now a push logs the completion
Yes, it's time once again to return to the subject of moving files.
With the recent changes to the communications code between the receiver
and the generator, there is now a non-clogging channel that we can use
to signal the sender when a file has been successfully transferred,
which allows us
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:30:57PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
Yes, it's time once again to return to the subject of moving files.
With the recent changes to the communications code between the receiver
and the generator, there is now a non-clogging channel that we can use
to signal the sender
