well,
it seems that rsync doesn't fully support windows acl for the moment
when you try to rsync a source with any acl on files a crazy brain can
create
you just can't have more than an inherited scheme acl on the destination
for this mechanism, we have to use xcopy (which work at file level,
Marc Perkel wrote:
Seems to me it should warn but continue to copy the files anyway ignoring
the ACLs.
Not necessarily. Failing to copy the ACLs could result in an insufficiently
protected file. In that case, better to not copy w/o the ACLs.
And that's just an example off the top of my
OK - I think this should be fixed.
Running rsync -aA on a file system that doesn't support ACLs I get:
send_acl: sys_acl_get_file(mysql, SMB_ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Operation not supported
rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main.c(789)
And - it aborts.
Seems to me it
On Thu 11 Aug 2005, Marc Perkel wrote:
Forgive me if this has already been asked but - shouldn't the '-a'
switch include -X and -A for ACLs and extended attributes?
I thought that -a means everything - so when everything grows -a should
grow with it.
-a does not mean everything... e.g.
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Thu 11 Aug 2005, Marc Perkel wrote:
Forgive me if this has already been asked but - shouldn't the '-a'
switch include -X and -A for ACLs and extended attributes?
I thought that -a means everything - so when everything grows -a should
grow with it.
On Thu 11 Aug 2005, Marc Perkel wrote:
Forgive me if this has already been asked but - shouldn't the '-a'
switch include -X and -A for ACLs and extended attributes?
Given a better implementation of the --acls option (i.e. one that
doesn't complain if a source disk doesn't support ACLs), that
Wayne Davison wrote:
Given a better implementation of the --acls option (i.e. one that
doesn't complain if a source disk doesn't support ACLs), that might
make sense. Another thing to keep in mind, though, is that rsync
always passes the individual options to the remote rsync, so adding
Forgive me if this has already been asked but - shouldn't the '-a'
switch include -X and -A for ACLs and extended attributes?
I thought that -a means everything - so when everything grows -a should
grow with it.
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
Hi all, (i am new at rsync althought using it for a
year and half)
i was unable to find a direct answer to this
questions :
_does rsync under windowz really support ACL
replication ?_
if I "rsync" a directory, files inherit from the
acl of that dir. but if special acls are setted on some
