I've had problems with rsync on disk-disk transfers if I use the -v
option. Try it again without -v.
--Yan
"M. Drew Streib" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:38:22AM -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
> > However, I guess I wasn't very clear, the point of touching the local
> > file was to create
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:38:22AM -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
> However, I guess I wasn't very clear, the point of touching the local
> file was to create a mismatch between the date and time of the local
> copy and the remote copy. Would the -c option do something more than
> would be done based
Drew,
Thanks for the response! I'll try the -c option in a few days (I booted
back into windows for a few days of work that I must get done).
However, I guess I wasn't very clear, the point of touching the local
file was to create a mismatch between the date and time of the local
copy and the r
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 06:31:39AM -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
> I tried Cameron Simpson's advice (touching the local copy of the iso), and the
> results are useful but disappointing -- it shows that rsync is not updating the
> iso. (Thanks, Cameron.)
rsync probably thinks it doesn't need to chec
Does rsync work with vfat partitions? (See below, especially the paragraph
starting "(Before I send ...".)
I tried Cameron Simpson's advice (touching the local copy of the iso), and the
results are useful but disappointing -- it shows that rsync is not updating the
iso. (Thanks, Cameron.)
Be
