DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3749] rsync --help misleading information

2006-05-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-07 15:46 MST --- FYI, I didn't like the wording of the --delete option, so I had just recently improved it in the CVS version. I also improved the wording of the existing/ignore-existing opt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3749] rsync --help misleading information

2006-05-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3749] rsync --help misleading information

2006-05-03 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-03 17:16 MST --- I don't think the terms sender and receiver are problematic; they're equivalent to source and destination, respectively. However, some of the help is unclear and/or ambiguou