DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6694] rsync -A drops mask from ACL

2011-02-22 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6694 way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6694] rsync -A drops mask from ACL

2009-09-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6694 way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6694] rsync -A drops mask from ACL

2009-09-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6694 --- Comment #3 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-09-07 17:54 CST --- The unusual behavior of Solaris ACLs was previously discussed in this thread: http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2006-October/016404.html -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6694] rsync -A drops mask from ACL

2009-09-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6694 --- Comment #4 from way...@samba.org 2009-09-07 18:07 CST --- I used the --fake-super option to try a copy that is otherwise impossible on linux (since I don't have access to solaris) -- an ACL that has a mask that doesn't match the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6694] rsync -A drops mask from ACL

2009-09-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6694 --- Comment #5 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-09-07 23:48 CST --- Yes, according to the message linked in comment #3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6694] rsync -A drops mask from ACL

2009-09-05 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6694 --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@baldwin.users.panix.com 2009-09-05 13:28 CST --- Further testing shows that not only is the mask not preserved on transfer, but if it already exists, it is eliminated! -- Configure bugmail: