2016-01-24 18:53 GMT+01:00 Martin Pool :
...
>> You might be right but I am a bit hesitant.
>>
>>
>> http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/58338/when-porting-code-must-i-follow-the-original-license
>>
>> http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/90232/original-author-rights-in-a-lice
>
>
> >
> > > I guess I could write an initial protocol specification - but it would
> > > not be complete and I wouldn't be able to relicense my library to
> > > LGPL anyway.
> > >
> > > So I guess I have convinced myself that it is not worth the effort
> > > trying. Time is probably better spent
Hi Martin,
2016-01-23 18:41 GMT+01:00 Martin Pool :
> It seems like yajsync is a reimplementation of rsync's protocol by looking
> at the GPL'd C rsync source, but it doesn't actually include any code from
> rsync. Is that right?
Yes correct, it is a complete rewrite in Java. Most of it is
comple
Hi Andrey,
2016-01-23 4:02 GMT+01:00 Andrey Gursky :
...
> If they don't want to bother with just discussing, why would they take a
> big effort to claim? And your proposition for LGPL is not very
> different in opposite to BSD or public domain.
Yes, I agree. The risk of having a future lawsuit a
Hi,
from my point of view:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:48:09 +0100
Per Lundqvist wrote:
> ...
> > Getting the approval for a relicensing I think the contributions to
> > rsync have to be analyzed in detail to approach a reasonable number of
> > contributors.
> >
> > I experienced that finding a respo
...
> Getting the approval for a relicensing I think the contributions to
> rsync have to be analyzed in detail to approach a reasonable number of
> contributors.
>
> I experienced that finding a responsible person that is willing to
> discuss such a case in an organization that contributed source
Am 07.01.2016 um 23:26 schrieb Per Lundqvist:
> Hi,
>
> I am maintaining a port of rsync (https://github.com/perlundq/yajsync)
> which is GPL:ed of course. The main purpose of the project is to
> provide a Java API library for the rsync protocol. It would
> therefore be really nice to be able to us
Hi,
I am maintaining a port of rsync (https://github.com/perlundq/yajsync)
which is GPL:ed of course. The main purpose of the project is to
provide a Java API library for the rsync protocol. It would
therefore be really nice to be able to use LGPL as the license.
But in order to do so I would fir
