Mini-HOWTO: Fixing rsync on Tiger (Mac OS X 10.4.x)

2005-11-27 Thread J.D. Bakker
[Now the horse has left the barn, I decided to finally implement that backup system I'd been thinking about for ages. Disk crashes can be great motivators] [Web-location for the living version of this document: http://www.lartmaker.nl/rsync/] Goal: Producing a working network backup / cloni

Mini-HOWTO: Fixing rsync on Tiger (Mac OS X 10.4.x)

2005-12-01 Thread David Powell
This patch seems to work nicely except for the problem that if you resync a directory that has been synced using this.. Every resource fork is resynced because OS 10.4 accepts the ._filename and stores it properly in the resource fork but the rsync doesn't notice this.. and decides the file is

Mini-HOWTO: Fixing rsync on Tiger (Mac OS X 10.4.x)

2005-12-01 Thread David Powell
... ._resource forks being synced over and over despite the target file itself not moving.. Missing fact... I am attempting a link-destination based multiple backup that creates hard links to files that are duplicates and only moves the changed files.. This implementation of rsync is not not

Re: Mini-HOWTO: Fixing rsync on Tiger (Mac OS X 10.4.x)

2005-11-28 Thread Stephen Wong
My solution is to use a separate utility called "SplitForks" on OSX, then a unpatched rsync is used on a Mac to transfer files to a linux box for backup. SplitForks is a tool in OSX's Developer toolkit, which will make those "._xyz" files on HFS+ volume. I developed a shell script to use SplitFor

Re: Mini-HOWTO: Fixing rsync on Tiger (Mac OS X 10.4.x)

2005-12-01 Thread J.D. Bakker
At 09:54 -0500 01-12-2005, David Powell wrote: ... ._resource forks being synced over and over despite the target file itself not moving.. Is this Problem #4 mentioned in http://www.lartmaker.nl/rsync/ , or something else ? Missing fact... I am attempting a link-destination based multiple

Re: Mini-HOWTO: Fixing rsync on Tiger (Mac OS X 10.4.x)

2006-03-22 Thread David Powell
It is just the "performance" issue. However, this issue is unacceptable because of the number of files I am synching.. millions.. sending all of these resource forks is just asking for trouble... using RsyncX I only transfer a few thousand files each session but this error just transfers reso