On 10/26/2011 12:39 AM, Alex Jurkiewicz wrote:
Any comments?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Alex Jurkiewicza...@jurkiewi.cz wrote:
Hi all,
These two patches change how rsync handles temporary files on the receiver
side. The first patch adds a static token to rsync's temporary filenames.
The
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Alex Jurkiewicz a...@jurkiewi.cz wrote:
These two patches change how rsync handles temporary files on the receiver
side. The first patch adds a static token to rsync's temporary filenames.
The second patch ignores files with this token when using --cvs-ignore.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Wayne Davison way...@samba.org wrote:
Here's a patch that should handle the above idea:
http://pastebin.com/UTbtFu8Ta
Unknown Paste ID!
Regardless, all your suggested changes still improve the capability of
rsync to run simultaneously on the same tree, so it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Suddenly I feel compelled to point out the existence of --temp-dir
On 10/26/11 22:52, Alex Jurkiewicz wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Wayne Davison way...@samba.org wrote:
Here's a patch that should handle the above idea:
Any comments?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Alex Jurkiewicz a...@jurkiewi.cz wrote:
Hi all,
These two patches change how rsync handles temporary files on the receiver
side. The first patch adds a static token to rsync's temporary filenames.
The second patch ignores files with this token
Hi all,
These two patches change how rsync handles temporary files on the receiver
side. The first patch adds a static token to rsync's temporary filenames.
The second patch ignores files with this token when using --cvs-ignore.
http://pastebin.com/DL1jCNfm
http://pastebin.com/yy9duP8Z
The
