I wrote:
Hopefully they will accept your patch and there will be a 1.1.4 release,
which also incorporates the infblock.c fixes. It would be bad to have
different (broken) versions of zlib out there when this can easily be
avoided.
http://www.gzip.org/zlib/ says
Version 1.1.4 fixes a
It seems the patch we merged into rsync 2.5.3 is not correct and -z is
not reliable. I'll do another release shortly.
--
Martin
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On 5 Feb 2002, Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:30:51PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
rsync includes a slightly modified and incompatible version of zlib.
(PhD-project over-optimization...) To update to a newer zlib would
require merging those changes across.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 02:15:00PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
I'm going to do a three-way merge from 1.1.2-1.1.3 and 1.1.2-rsync,
and then perhaps send the patch to the upstream maintainers. Whether
they will accept it is another matter.
That's what I did when I generated the patch I sent to
On 29 Jan 2002, Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch (apologies for the size) updates zlib/* to the files that ship with
zlib 1.1.3.
rsync includes a slightly modified and incompatible version of zlib.
(PhD-project over-optimization...) To update to a newer zlib would
require
This patch (apologies for the size) updates zlib/* to the files that ship with
zlib 1.1.3.
Index: zlib/ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/rsync/zlib/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 ChangeLog
--- zlib/ChangeLog 7
