RE: Dealing with an unreliable remote

2014-11-25 Thread Tony Abernethy
(until a better answer comes along) The killed rsync process should leave a temporary file .. If you rename the temporary to the real file name, rsync should continue from about where it left off. -Original Message- From: rsync-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:rsync-boun...@lists.samba.org]

Re: Dealing with an unreliable remote

2014-11-25 Thread net.rsync
On 2014-11-25T10:27:13 -0600 "Tony Abernethy" wrote: > (until a better answer comes along) > The killed rsync process should leave a temporary file .. > If you rename the temporary to the real file name, rsync should continue > from about where it left off. Thanks, that'll at least help to get t

Re: Dealing with an unreliable remote

2014-11-25 Thread Matthias Schniedermeyer
On 25.11.2014 15:02, net.rs...@io7m.com wrote: > 'Lo. > > I've run into a frustrating issue when trying to synchronize a > directory hierarchy over a reliable (but slow) connection to an > unreliable remote. Basically, I have the following: > > http://mvn-repository.io7m.com/com/io7m/ > > Thi

Re: Dealing with an unreliable remote

2014-11-25 Thread net.rsync
On 2014-11-25T20:03:27 +0100 Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > --inplace --partial > > The later prevents rsync from discarting partial files, the former makes > rsync "reuse" already transfered parts and overwriting/appending as > needed. > > You only have to be careful if you use hardlinks