Re: Might hanging bugs remain in rsync 3.0.0?

2007-07-16 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 11:09:57PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > Furthermore, from April 27 to July 10, about 2.5 months passed without > any hanging bugs being found; then, on July 11, Warren Oates reported > one. That was a brand new one that I introduced into the code when I tweaked the index

Re: Might hanging bugs remain in rsync 3.0.0?

2007-07-16 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 7/16/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 11:09:57PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > Furthermore, from April 27 to July 10, about 2.5 months passed without > any hanging bugs being found; then, on July 11, Warren Oates reported > one. That was a brand new one th

RE: Might hanging bugs remain in rsync 3.0.0?

2007-07-16 Thread Tony Abernethy
Matt McCutchen wrote: > > On 7/16/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 11:09:57PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > > Furthermore, from April 27 to July 10, about 2.5 months passed > > > without any hanging bugs being found; then, on July 11, > Warren Oates >

Re: Might hanging bugs remain in rsync 3.0.0?

2007-07-16 Thread jholt
On Jul 16, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote: Instead of making users scratch their heads when something goes wrong, I think it would be prudent to make --no-ir the default in rsync 3.0.0. (I'm afraid that if you don't, some distributions might.) Users who care about the improved performa