On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:28:32 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI Motohiro
wrote:
> Who can make rsync like io pattern test suite? a code change is easy. but
> to comfirm justification is more harder work.
>
I'm afraid I don't have time to work up any code. I would be happy to
try the patch with my backup use-ca
On 11/14/2010 12:20 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:09:29 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI
Motohiro wrote:
Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :)
Alright, fair enough. It still seems like there are many cases where
fadvise seems more appropriate, but memcg s
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:09:29 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI Motohiro
wrote:
> Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :)
>
Alright, fair enough. It still seems like there are many cases where
fadvise seems more appropriate, but memcg should at least satisfy my
personal needs s
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:28:02 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI Motohiro
wrote:
> So, I don't think application developers will use fadvise() aggressively
> because we don't have a cross platform agreement of a fadvice behavior.
>
I strongly disagree. For a long time I have been trying to resolve
interactivity
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
> It looks like a few folks have discussed addressing the issue in the past,
> but nothing has happened as of 2.6.36.
Yeah, the linux code for this has long been buggy and near useless. What is
really needed is a way for some file access to be
