,
> 19061,29556,8289,28271,29800,25970,8304,25970,27680,26721,25451,25970),
> ".\n" '
> "There are some who call me.... Tim?"
>
>
>
>
> Rusty Carruth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 02/13/2002 0
Rusty Carruth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 02/13/2002 08:23 AM
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
> Subject:Re[2]: unexpected EOF in read_timeout (was
ECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/13/2002 08:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject: Re[2]: unexpected EOF in read_timeout (was Re[2]: [Fwd: Re:
meaning of "IO
Error: skipping the delete"]])
Nitin Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Rusty,
> We have not defined the timeout parameter in the configuration file. That means no
>timeout (by
> default). So, that cant be the solution.
> Further, I checked on the net (in the mailing lists), many are complaining the same
>error, bu
