On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:07:13PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
Rsync version 2.6.7pre1 is now available for release testing. Please
give it a try and send email to the regular mailing list with any
questions, comments, bug reports, etc.
Hi,
The NEWS didn't mention the new functionality
How does this function work? I have not seen it discussed on the
mailling list.
Thanks,
Gian
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:07:13PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
Rsync version 2.6.7pre1 is now available for release testing. Please
give it a try and send email to the regular mailing list
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:33:42AM +0100, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
The NEWS didn't mention the new functionality allowing to take into
account renamed files and not retransfer them.
Will it be included in 2.6.7?
No, it didn't quite make it. My testing of the early patch that I
posted
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 09:02:01AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:33:42AM +0100, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
The NEWS didn't mention the new functionality allowing to take into
account renamed files and not retransfer them.
Will it be included in 2.6.7?
No,
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:10:30AM -0500, Dave Mielke wrote:
The itemized output now uses 'S' for a special file instead of
clumping them together with the 'D' for devices.
Is this a Windows thing?
Nope. On Posix systems, you need root privileges to create devices
(character or block) but
On Wed 08 Feb 2006, Wayne Davison wrote:
Rsync version 2.6.7pre1 is now available for release testing. Please
give it a try and send email to the regular mailing list with any
questions, comments, bug reports, etc.
A couple of text improvements / typos that were sent to me...
Paul Slootman
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:02:44PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
-Note this this option typically achieves better compression ratios that can
+Note this this option typically achieves better compression ratios than can
I also note that the first this should be that.
-options that rsync might
Is the --ipv4, --ipv6 description twice in the manpage?
The description is quite different, so I'm wondering whether it should
be in a different context :-)
Paul Slootman
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read:
Wayne Davison wrote:
- (below) in order to have the rules that are read-in from the file
+ (below) in order to have the rules that are read in from the file
I consider the original a good use of hyphenation to help distinguish
the phrase are read-in from a file (using the past-tense of
[quoted lines by Jamie Lokier on 2006/02/09 at 18:55 +]
I think the hyphen is out of place; it looks very wrong to my eye, but
I'm not a grammarian so don't have a fine explanation.
You're quite right ... read in should be two separate words as there should
not be a hyphen between a verb and
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:02:44PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
--- rsync-2.6.7pre1.orig/rsync.yo
+++ rsync-2.6.7pre1/rsync.yo
@@ -1014,7 +1018,7 @@
as it is sent to the destination machine, which reduces the amount of data
being transmitted -- something that is useful over a slow
Rsync version 2.6.7pre1 is now available for release testing. Please
give it a try and send email to the regular mailing list with any
questions, comments, bug reports, etc.
You can read all about the latest improvements and bug-fixes in the NEWS
file:
http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync
[quoted lines by Wayne Davison on 2006/02/08 at 21:07 -0800]
You can read all about the latest improvements and bug-fixes in the NEWS
file:
http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.7pre1-NEWS
The itemized output now uses 'S' for a special file instead of clumping them
together
13 matches
Mail list logo
