Re: bad behaviour of "dry run" -n option

2004-04-25 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 12:22:57PM +0400, Denis Lagno wrote: > I see strange behaviour in presence of symlink. Facinating case there! The copy you cited is really going to delete the symlink in the destination and recopy the whole dir, so it does not list deletions within the X11 dir. What is ap

Re: bad behaviour of "dry run" -n option

2004-04-24 Thread Denis Lagno
sorry, forgot to cc to mailing list > I can't reproduce this -- rsync always reports the files that would > be deleted. If you're still seeing a problem, please provide a more > detailed test case. yes, it works fine under normal circumstances. I see strange behaviour in presence of symlink. Bel

Re: bad behaviour of "dry run" -n option

2004-04-23 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:40:07PM +0400, Denis Lagno wrote: > rsync --delete -anvc /dir1 /dir2 > > It is natural to expect to see printed out all files that would be > updated including files that would be deleted. But such invocation > do not print files that would be deleted. I can't reproduc

bad behaviour of "dry run" -n option

2004-04-22 Thread Denis Lagno
I use rsync-current. I tried to do something like: rsync --delete -anvc /dir1 /dir2 It is natural to expect to see printed out all files that would be updated including files that would be deleted. But such invocation do not print files that would be deleted. -- To unsubscribe or change option