Re: easiest way to do incrimentals?

2005-05-19 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 18 May 2005, Wayne Davison wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: What I've been wondering is whether --fuzzy will also work with --link-dest, i.e. hard-link to files whose names are slightly different but are the same for other purposes Fuzzy

Re: easiest way to do incrimentals?

2005-05-18 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:08:59PM -0400, Vincent Yonemitsu wrote: With the --backup and --backup-dir options that means that it copies out the files that are going to be changed before overwriting them to the specified directory? Yes. That gives you a hierarchy with just the old version of

Re: easiest way to do incrimentals?

2005-05-18 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 18 May 2005, Wayne Davison wrote: It can be better to do a --compare-dest or --link-dest into a new (empty) hierarchy, as this gives you a hierarchy with either (for --compare-dest) just the new version of changed files in it or (for --link-dest) all the files with

Re: easiest way to do incrimentals?

2005-05-18 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: What I've been wondering is whether --fuzzy will also work with --link-dest, i.e. hard-link to files whose names are slightly different but are the same for other purposes Fuzzy doesn't really do much with --link-dest at the

easiest way to do incrimentals?

2005-05-17 Thread Vincent Yonemitsu
With the --backup and --backup-dir options that means that it copies out the files that are going to be changed before overwriting them to the specified directory? Vincent YonemitsuInformation Technology Services(905)639-3611 ext 153[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe or change options: