hi,
I am trying to rsync a very large filesystem which is about 3TB, but
naturally I want to exclude a lot of things. However, I am really
struggling with excluding directories.
SRC=/dasd/december/2008 #Notice there is no trailing slash
TARGET=/backup/december/2008 #Notice there is no trailing s
Dear Wayne,
I am using rsync to synchronize my working files from home computer to
the work computer. I want to sync only the files in some directories and
no .files. However, I do need to sync several files from .mozilla
director (addressbook, calendar and bookmarks) which are located in the
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 10:29 -0500, Mag Gam wrote:
> I am trying to rsync a very large filesystem which is about 3TB, but
> naturally I want to exclude a lot of things. However, I am really
> struggling with excluding directories.
>
> SRC=/dasd/december/2008 #Notice there is no trailing slash
> TA
Thanks Matt for the response.
The *** was the magic bullet and it works. Thanks.
I was curious about the --link-dest argument. Will this speed up
anything? I noticed it has the same default behavior of cp -al
If its faster or more efficient I would be more than happy to implement this.
O
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 17:26 -0500, Mag Gam wrote:
> I was curious about the --link-dest argument. Will this speed up
> anything? I noticed it has the same default behavior of cp -al
>
> If its faster or more efficient I would be more than happy to implement this.
You can run rsync once with --li
On Thu 25 Mar 2010, Vitaly V. Ganusov wrote:
>
> from excluded-utk.txt file:
>
> + .mozilla-thunderbird/
> + .mozilla-thunderbird/afc5fv2p.default/
> + .mozilla-thunderbird/afc5fv2p.default/abook.mab
> + .mozilla-thunderbird/afc5fv2p.default/storage.sdb
> - .mozilla-thunderbird/afc5fv2p.default/I
You are right, the reason that I did not see that before is that the
file on the server was newer than on my desktop. It now all works.
However, it seems like a very messy way to sync a given file (by
excluding bunch of other files that are not needed). Would you suggest a
better way? Could yo
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Vitaly V. Ganusov wrote:
> However, it seems like a very messy way to sync a given file (by
> excluding bunch of other files that are not needed). Would you suggest
> a better way? Could you suggest a simple way/script to generate such
> a file (see attached) with only a f
