Wayne Davison (way...@samba.org) wrote on 4 July 2011 17:10:
>On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>
>When --checksum is used they're calculated in both ends to see if the file
>should be transfered. This is of course not necessary if the file doesn't
>exist in t
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> When --checksum is used they're calculated in both ends to see if the file
> should be transfered. This is of course not necessary if the file doesn't
> exist in the destination. However, the checksum is still calculated by the
> sender, whi
Jamie Lokier (ja...@shareable.org) wrote on 4 July 2011 00:00:
>Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> When --checksum is used they're calculated in both ends to see if the
>> file should be transfered. This is of course not necessary if the file
>> doesn't exist in the destination. However, the checksum is
Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> When --checksum is used they're calculated in both ends to see if the
> file should be transfered. This is of course not necessary if the file
> doesn't exist in the destination. However, the checksum is still
> calculated by the sender, which is often a very large overhead
When --checksum is used they're calculated in both ends to see if the
file should be transfered. This is of course not necessary if the file
doesn't exist in the destination. However, the checksum is still
calculated by the sender, which is often a very large overhead.
Would it be possible to avoi