Re: inefficient: --checksum calculation shouldn't be done for new files

2011-07-11 Thread Carlos Carvalho
Wayne Davison (way...@samba.org) wrote on 4 July 2011 17:10: >On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > >When --checksum is used they're calculated in both ends to see if the file >should be transfered. This is of course not necessary if the file doesn't >exist in t

Re: inefficient: --checksum calculation shouldn't be done for new files

2011-07-04 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > When --checksum is used they're calculated in both ends to see if the file > should be transfered. This is of course not necessary if the file doesn't > exist in the destination. However, the checksum is still calculated by the > sender, whi

Re: inefficient: --checksum calculation shouldn't be done for new files

2011-07-03 Thread Carlos Carvalho
Jamie Lokier (ja...@shareable.org) wrote on 4 July 2011 00:00: >Carlos Carvalho wrote: >> When --checksum is used they're calculated in both ends to see if the >> file should be transfered. This is of course not necessary if the file >> doesn't exist in the destination. However, the checksum is

Re: inefficient: --checksum calculation shouldn't be done for new files

2011-07-03 Thread Jamie Lokier
Carlos Carvalho wrote: > When --checksum is used they're calculated in both ends to see if the > file should be transfered. This is of course not necessary if the file > doesn't exist in the destination. However, the checksum is still > calculated by the sender, which is often a very large overhead

inefficient: --checksum calculation shouldn't be done for new files

2011-07-02 Thread Carlos Carvalho
When --checksum is used they're calculated in both ends to see if the file should be transfered. This is of course not necessary if the file doesn't exist in the destination. However, the checksum is still calculated by the sender, which is often a very large overhead. Would it be possible to avoi