On 14 Jun 2001, "Wilson, Mark - MST" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin
>
> >To tridge and I, rsync 2.x is essentially in maintenance mode at the
> >moment: it doesn't seem like a good investment to add more features or
> >functionality to the codebase. A better way to improve it is to build
>
On 13 Jun 2001, Deven Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in the process of gathing up information for the creation of an
> rsync/srsync io slave for KDE.
I'm happy to hear you're interested in working on this.
> I am wondering if I could get your input
> on the best appro
Martin
>To tridge and I, rsync 2.x is essentially in maintenance mode at the
>moment: it doesn't seem like a good investment to add more features or
>functionality to the codebase. A better way to improve it is to build
>a new, cleaner protocol.
Does this mean there is a version 3.x on its wa
On 13 Jun 2001, Deven Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in the process of gathing up information for the creation of an
> rsync/srsync io slave for KDE.
I'm happy to hear you're interested in working on this.
> I am wondering if I could get your input
> on the best appro
