I just read an article on Kernel Trap that mentioned that rsync wasn't
quite meeting the needs of the linux kernel developers and I was
wondering if H. Peter Anvin or Nathan Laredo had expressed their needs
to the rsync developers?
I didn't see anything in the mail archives.
...
While the pu
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 02:18:13PM -0600, Andrew Shewmaker wrote:
> I was wondering if H. Peter Anvin or Nathan Laredo had expressed their
> needs to the rsync developers?
No, they've not talked about what they're doing here. It would be very
interesting to hear their thoughts on a utility that w
On 6/21/05, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 02:18:13PM -0600, Andrew Shewmaker wrote:
> > I was wondering if H. Peter Anvin or Nathan Laredo had expressed their
> > needs to the rsync developers?
>
> No, they've not talked about what they're doing here. It would
On 21 Jun 2005, at 11:49, Wayne Davison wrote:
No, they've not talked about what they're doing here. It would be
very
interesting to hear their thoughts on a utility that worked better
with
large numbers of files. One thing that I had thought to look into at
some point is a way to monitor t
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 02:18:13PM -0600, Andrew Shewmaker wrote:
I was wondering if H. Peter Anvin or Nathan Laredo had expressed their
needs to the rsync developers?
No, they've not talked about what they're doing here. It would be very
interestin
On 6/21/05, Wesley Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21 Jun 2005, at 11:49, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > No, they've not talked about what they're doing here. It would be
> > very
> > interesting to hear their thoughts on a utility that worked better
> > with
> > large numbers of files. One thing
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:14:29PM +0100, Mark Thornton wrote:
> Rsync appears not to use its difference mechanism for transmitting
> this list. Where the percentage of files changed is small, rsync might
> be a great deal faster if it did transmit this list in the same way as
> regular files.
Yea
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:51:27PM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote:
> The idea is that each machine keeps a transcript of what it has (or
> had), and generates a list of changes locally.
If the master server maintained a list of the files that were changed,
the mirroring systems could use the --files-
