Re: rsync 3.0.9 incompatible with self? (proto incompat on local-local)

2012-08-21 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Linda Walsh rs...@tlinx.org wrote: How can I show it to you? One thing you can try is to build 3.1.0dev (from git or nightly tar file) and run that with --debug=hlink5. If the copying is remote (using ssh), you can put the executable off to the side somewhere

Re: rsync 3.0.9 incompatible with self? (proto incompat on local-local)

2012-08-12 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Linda Walsh rs...@tlinx.org wrote: How can I have a proto incompat when it it is talking to itself?... You cited a hard-link bug in the incremental recursion algorithm. You can work around it by specifying --no-inc-recursive (--no-i-r). If you have a

Re: rsync 3.0.9 incompatible with self? (proto incompat on local-local)

2012-08-12 Thread Linda Walsh
How can I show it to you? I'm pretty sure I can produce it on demand -- just take another snapshot and do a rsync w/o the no-i-r switch... But it's not like I can send you a HD via email...they are sorta big...? Wayne Davison wrote: On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Linda Walsh

rsync 3.0.9 incompatible with self? (proto incompat on local-local)

2012-08-05 Thread Linda Walsh
Familiar? protocol error on a local file copy? How can I have a proto incompat when it it is talking to itself?... This was on the ERROUT... rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]: Broken pipe (32) File-list index 531530 not in 531937 - 533437