Hi all,
I have applied the patch at http://metastatic.org/source/rsync-ssl.patch
to the rsync v2.6.2 tree, and have it installed between two hosts.
Unfortunately the patch contains no docs, so I have no idea whether I've
configured it correctly. Any attempt at making an rsync transfer bombs
out
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:11:18AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:00:46AM +, M. Drew Streib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:47:15AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> | > That way we could do SMTP over SSL etc etc transparently: clients connec
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:00:46AM +, M. Drew Streib wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:47:15AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > That way we could do SMTP over SSL etc etc transparently: clients connect,
> > say "SSL", if rejected either fall back or fall out, and if accepted
> > then away w
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:00:46AM +, M. Drew Streib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:47:15AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| > That way we could do SMTP over SSL etc etc transparently: clients connect,
| > say "SSL", if rejected either fall back or fall out, and if acce
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:47:15AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> That way we could do SMTP over SSL etc etc transparently: clients connect,
> say "SSL", if rejected either fall back or fall out, and if accepted
> then away we all go.
>
> Is there some technical reason for not doing things this
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:10:45PM -0500, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:29:37PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
| > My concern with SSH is making it function with an authentication space
| > different than the /etc/passwd space, and absolutely ensuring that there
|
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:29:37PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
> Dave Dykstra wrote:
>
> > If stunnel doesn't work, how about this idea: what if you hand out an
> > unencrypted SSH "private" key to all users, and put in a .ssh/authorized_keys
> > on the server with a forced command that restricts w
Dave Dykstra wrote:
> If stunnel doesn't work, how about this idea: what if you hand out an
> unencrypted SSH "private" key to all users, and put in a .ssh/authorized_keys
> on the server with a forced command that restricts what the users can do
> to specific rsync commands? That will still enc
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:41:19PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
> I'm finding even less on rsync and SSL. I would have imagined someone
> would have done something with this already, but apparently not. So
> I guess I need to ask and see for sure: has anyone worked on issues of
>
I'm finding even less on rsync and SSL. I would have imagined someone
would have done something with this already, but apparently not. So
I guess I need to ask and see for sure: has anyone worked on issues of
using rsync via SSL, such as with stunnel? I want to have encrypted
access, e
10 matches
Mail list logo
