Does anyone have a version of RSync built for OpenVMS I64?
James T Horn
Systems Administrator IV
Sam Houston State University
AB1, Room 320
Office: 936-294-1042
h...@shsu.edumailto:h...@shsu.edu
IT@Sam
Communicate+Collaborate
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 09:24:56PM +, Horn, James wrote:
I'm looking at need to duplicate some drives data from one OpenVMS site to
another OpenVMS site. Clustering is not an option, so was wondering if Rsync
could be used between two OpenVMS sites and if there would be any issues with
I'm looking at need to duplicate some drives data from one OpenVMS site to
another OpenVMS site. Clustering is not an option, so was wondering if Rsync
could be used between two OpenVMS sites and if there would be any issues with
the files.
James Horn
SHSU 2449
Computer Services
Sam Houston
jw schultz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:28:11PM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
There are approximately 235 global and static variables in rsync, and
of those 105 are obviously never modified after the fork() takes place.
That may be the case for several of the others, like the 10 in batch.c
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 11:59:48PM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
jw schultz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:28:11PM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
There are approximately 235 global and static variables in rsync, and
of those 105 are obviously never modified after the fork() takes
jw schultz wrote:
Sounds promising.
The pitfall you with rsync in threads is that rsync forks
with a COW expectation using a great deal of data set prior
to the fork. Some of that data is altered. In particular a
slew of global variables that must become thread unique when
modified or things
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:28:11PM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
jw schultz wrote:
Sounds promising.
The pitfall you with rsync in threads is that rsync forks
with a COW expectation using a great deal of data set prior
to the fork. Some of that data is altered. In particular a
slew of
jw schultz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:38:40AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
I am trying to restart getting rsync to run on OpenVMS, and find a way
around the fork() issue, posibly using POSIX threads.
It occurs to me that i may have been overly encouraging in
my last followup.
Getting
on OpenVMS is able to
properly replicate a sample directory of plain text files from a local
server running rsync on Windows 2000.
I just successfully used rsync running on OpenVMS to download the
current rsync development tree. I deleted a few files, and reran rsync
which repopulated just
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 11:01, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 13:00, John E. Malmberg wrote:
jw schultz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:38:40AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
[...]
I have not heard of unison. I have heard that pysync was successful in
a limited test on
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 13:00, John E. Malmberg wrote:
jw schultz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:38:40AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
[...]
I do not know but if OpenVMS support is a problem for rsync
proper you might wish to look at pysync or unison which
might meet your immediate
jw schultz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:38:40AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
I am trying to restart getting rsync to run on OpenVMS, and find a way
around the fork() issue, posibly using POSIX threads.
It occurs to me that i may have been overly encouraging in
my last followup.
Getting
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:38:40AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
I am trying to restart getting rsync to run on OpenVMS, and find a way
around the fork() issue, posibly using POSIX threads.
It occurs to me that i may have been overly encouraging in
my last followup.
Getting rsync to work
13 matches
Mail list logo
