, this is quite efficient, I might write some "howto" one day about this setup for those interested.
Regards.
- Mail original -
De: "David Lang"
À: "rsyslog-users"
Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Mars 2013 19:38:45
Objet: Re: [rsyslog] Rsyslog & Distributed
"rsyslog-users"
Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Mars 2013 19:38:45
Objet: Re: [rsyslog] Rsyslog & Distributed File Systems??
The issue I would be concerned about with these races is that rsyslog can issue
large writes to the OS. The OS then can split the writes on block size
boundries
when it
The issue I would be concerned about with these races is that rsyslog can issue
large writes to the OS. The OS then can split the writes on block size boundries
when it sends them on to the filesystem. Since the block boundries won't match
up with line boundries, you will have parts of lines fro
seems glusterfs 'should' handle the races with its locking translator, but like
every distributed , they have their throughput limits.
so I guess it would depend on the load of your use case.
A quick google search turned up some stories of race condition drama with
GlusterFS ( https://www.goo
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
Is there a version of rsyslog that can properly use distributed filesystems
like GlusterFS? For example, I have two nodes each running rsyslog but
also sharing a GlusterFS filesystem. Can those independent rsys
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
Is there a version of rsyslog that can properly use distributed filesystems
like GlusterFS? For example, I have two nodes each running rsyslog but also
sharing a GlusterFS filesystem. Can those independent rsyslog processes
running on different serve
Is there a version of rsyslog that can properly use distributed filesystems
like GlusterFS? For example, I have two nodes each running rsyslog but also
sharing a GlusterFS filesystem. Can those independent rsyslog processes
running on different servers write to the same file on the Gluster
7 matches
Mail list logo
