I was more wondering how hard it would be to just default them to an
"rt" scheme since it would seem to make more sense for people who have
nothing to do with the fsck.com domain. Even RT has nothing to do with
the fsck.com domain now since I believe it was the author's personal
domain when it was
All tickets should have fsck.com-rt schemes. Why would that be
a problem?
-Todd
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I
> remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't. I'm wondering if it's
> worth bothering
You may well not have done ... I just remembered something about
wanting to take it away but not wanting to break too much stuff ...?
PK
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2006 13:59
To: Philip Kime
Cc: RT users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] The "f
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I
> remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't.
When did I say this?
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/
Will this URI scheme
thing be continued in later versions of RT? I remember JV saying that it
probably wouldn't. I'm wondering if it's worth bothering with generating patches
to get rid of the hard-coded "fsck.com-rt-" scheme because I need to use a lot
of REST calls making links etc. and ev
