Re: [rt-users] Due dates based on custom fields

2010-01-19 Thread William Graboyes
Hi Jose, Damn laptop, clicked send before I was ready. at any rate the SLA extension is per ticket, you can also have defaults based on queue. thanks, Bill On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:22 PM, William Graboyes < william.grabo...@theportalgrp.com> wrote: > Hi Jose, > > > Check out the RT::SLA add o

Re: [rt-users] Due dates based on custom fields

2010-01-19 Thread William Graboyes
Hi Jose, Check out the RT::SLA add on works great, and is easy to set up. On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior < jose.jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, I want to use custom fields to classify the tickets on the support > queue as some pre-defined services. Each service ha

[rt-users] Due dates based on custom fields

2010-01-19 Thread Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior
So, I want to use custom fields to classify the tickets on the support queue as some pre-defined services. Each service has a defined SLA. I am also using escalation of tickets based on due date. Is there anything out that can define the due date of tickets based on those custom fields? I saw the S

Re: [rt-users] How to Search Resolved Tickets & How to Backup RT DB?

2010-01-19 Thread Jason Ledford
I believe ticket attachments are stored in the attachments table and stored as blob data. so an sql backup should get that as well. From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com [rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Zach Boettner [za..

[rt-users] Links to linked tickets

2010-01-19 Thread Matt Adams
Folks: Our RT installation is accessible from two locations, one public and the other internally or over our VPN. In the majority of situations this does not cause a problem however I have noticed that the hyperlinks for any linked tickets use the URL configured by $WebDomain rather than simpl

[rt-users] How to Search Resolved Tickets & How to Backup RT DB?

2010-01-19 Thread Zach Boettner
Two questions: 1. How can I modify RT so that when I search in the 'quick search' box at the top right of the page it searches all tickets, including resolved tickets? 2. What is the best way to backup the entire RT database, including attachments, etc. Currently I am doing an export

[rt-users] Error with funny redirect SpawnLinkedTicketInQueue

2010-01-19 Thread Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior
After installing this plugin I get the new button to create linked tickets, but when I click on "Create" it redirects to: http://rtelements/SpawnLinkedTicket?CloneTicket=2&SpawnLinkedTicket=Criar&LinkType=DependsOn-new&CloneQueue=1 As I can see on the code it tries to get the WebURL to redirect,

Re: [rt-users] time ticket creation incorrect

2010-01-19 Thread Jac Gubbels
Also found out that after the creation, the 'last updated' time of the ticket in fact is correct. Only the creation time is off. Any idea? -- Jac On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Jac Gubbels wrote: > hmmm, but both the server time and 'Select NOW()' give the correct time ... > Where else should

Re: [rt-users] Slow queries building list of privileged users (Postgres)

2010-01-19 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:25:02AM -0500, Jesse Vincent wrote: > > > I think your suggested new index in group is correct; that's > > eliminated some more slow queries. I think I'll try and put up a > > set of annotated additional postgres indexes on the wiki, in lieu > > of future updates to the

[rt-users] E-Mail Ticket Parsing and Decoding

2010-01-19 Thread John Hascall
Hi all, As my first real RT project I need to write a Scrip to parse values out of an email at ticket creation time and set some Custom Fields. Because the data is structured (xml) it looks like "ExtractCustomFieldValues" probably isn't going to be up to the task. It looks like getting the cont

[rt-users] Malicious MIME type handling

2010-01-19 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
I've noticed that there is some logic to override the mime type of HTML attachments ($TrustHTMLAttachments config) to avoid javascript XSS attacks in RT. This was flagged up by a user who was, not unreasonably, confused that this meant that HTML attachments just resulted in the browser displaying