Thanks.
El El mar, 7 de jun. de 2016 a las 18:35, Emmanuel Lacour <
elac...@easter-eggs.com> escribió:
> Le 07/06/2016 à 19:35, Andrea Caputto a écrit :
> > are you sure that extension is working for RT 4.4?
> >
>
> I don't know, I do not have 4.4 on production servers yet (will do soon).
>
--
An
Le 07/06/2016 à 19:35, Andrea Caputto a écrit :
> are you sure that extension is working for RT 4.4?
>
I don't know, I do not have 4.4 on production servers yet (will do soon).
-
RT 4.4 and RTIR Training Sessions https://bestpractical.com/training
* Los Angeles - September, 2016
Le 07/06/2016 à 23:23, Hugo Escobar a écrit :
> We need to give our users the possibility of receiving large files (say
>> 10MB)
>
> Knowing the attachment size limit all email services impose, we thought
> there should be a way to tell RT to replace large attachments with a
> download
> link when
We need to give our users the possibility of receiving large files (say >
10MB)
Knowing the attachment size limit all email services impose, we thought
there should be a way to tell RT to replace large attachments with a
download
link when constructing the email message allowing the user to access
Hello,
Just curious to know if any has had an issue when they try to forward the
History on a Ticket and it not go through the mail system when it's larger than
100 KB?
I can send if I only forward one section but there are times when we need to
forward more. Most of the time we need the pictu
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Barton Chittenden <
bar...@bywatersolutions.com> wrote:
> In a further twist, html entities display correctly on the "Article
> Display" page, but when the canned response is actually *used*, I see
> html entities in the reply editor... but if I include text like ,
are you sure that extension is working for RT 4.4?
Thanks
El vie., 3 jun. 2016 a las 10:43, Emmanuel Lacour ()
escribió:
> Le 03/06/2016 à 15:25, Andrea Caputto a écrit :
> > Hello Emmanuel thanks for your comment, it is right if i put :
> >
> > Set($RT::Extension::PermissiveHTML, '1');
> >
>
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 15:17:15 +0200 Christian Loos wrote:
> Am 01.06.2016 um 11:53 schrieb Vegard Vesterheim:
>> I tried to register a new User Custom Field, naming the Field
>> 'PreferEditDisplay', and allowing two values for the field: 'Edit' or
>> 'Display'. I have registered the value 'Edit' fo
